Fritz Chess Benchmark/Super PI Thread 2010

[ejr22]

Thought I'd do the tests with my main machine as well.

Core i7 920 @ 4.2GHz
Super PI (1M) = 9.723s
Fritz = 15383

 

[Geckovich]

LOL, he's missed mine too.

Made them easier to read now too.

They're noted now for when I next update. I couldn't read them before.

You should be showing those with i7 920 or above CPU's with turbo mode on as at that speed, so I have turbo mode on and I get 4.2Ghz, all cores runs at that speed. It's misleading the benchmark scores when you don't display the correct frequency.

I'm only going to note the speeds people are listing, I have no way of telling who's using turbo and who isn't.

 

[DavyBoy]

@Raven, how do you mean mate?

I don't quite follow..

 

[Geckovich]

@Raven, how do you mean mate?

I don't quite follow..

I think assume he means that a 4ghz i7 with turbo on will run fritz at 4ghz, but pi at 4.2ghz. Possibly giving it an unfair advantage over an i7 without turbo

 

[DavyBoy]

I still don't follow, if the chip is running at 4.4GHz with turbo on then that's the speed Fritz will run at surely???

 

[Geckovich]

Oh, I thought turbo was only used when running a single threaded app. If that isn't the case then I don't see what the problem is either.

 

[icysniper]

now, my results fail badly

 

[chipps101]

now, my results fail badly

you beat the atom though

i have an old athlon xp1600 that i might bench and see if that beats the atom also

 

[icysniper]

you beat the atom though

i have an old athlon xp1600 that i might bench and see if that beats the atom also

wow thats impressive for this comp, as it is a 7 year old laptop

 

[Uriel]

Pushed mine a bit higher:
Phenom FX-5000 @ 3.3GHz (with NB clocked to 2400MHz - can we say it's an unlocked and clocked Athlon X2 5000 45nm? )

Fritz = 7662, SuperPi = 21.885

Edit: turns out that IntelBurn fails with my NB clocked to 2400. Backed off to 2100 and it's fine.

 

[chipps101]

nooooooooooooo the atom beat me


athlon xp 1600 @ 1.4
PI - 86.391
FRITZ - 656

i have an athlon 64 3500+, a core2duo e4300 and the celeron e3200 in my htpc all at stock that i could bench if required but won't unless people want them done

 

[TK421]

good results from the i3's compared to the more expensive dual cores!

 

[Trunks9486]

I am curious about the results for the Athlon 64 and the Celeron!

I also suggest in the final table to have value for stock settings vs. an overclock that is achievable by most users without too expensive cooling. I think this will show the value proposition better.

 

[reiyushin]

Comeon where's the first AMD to break 10k in Fritz

 

[Muel]

I only ran SuperPi, and this was the shakiest overclock ever. I did get a run done at 4.020ghz which was 17.1 secs but it crashed while I was getting the screenshot.

Still, not bad for a C2! I'd be surprised if a C3 couldn't get a 4.2-4.3ghz run done. (It'd be incredibly unstable though).

EDIT: Screenshot taken for the Overclocking Phenom II thread, which asks for the posters name to be in the screenshot somewhere.

 

[Muel]

Comeon where's the first AMD to break 10k in Fritz

Don't tempt me! I'd give it a good go but I don't want to push my CPU that hard again for a while, it worries me.

EDIT: That and I very much doubt it would do it.

 

[chipps101]

athlon 64 3500+ @ 2.2
PI - 42.407
FRITZ - 1264


celeron e3200 @ 2.4
PI - 24.648
FRITZ - 3275

and yes i finally figured out the screen capture thing

also would operating system matter for these as thats 4 different ones for 4 different machines for me now lol

 

[paradisiac]

i dont know anything about these apps, do these rely 100% on cpu, or does other hardware effect the results?

 

[chipps101]

i'm sure memory and fsb speeds must come into it also

 

[paradisiac]

i'm sure memory and fsb speeds must come into it also

then should these not also be taken into account its hard to get an accurate table if not everyone is using identical stuff other than cpu surely, unless it is a 100% cpu test?