Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2009
- Posts
- 5,712
which new company please?
The other isp do FTTPoD are https://cerberusnetworks.co.uk/connectivity-broadband/cerberus-fttp-and-gfast
and the first isp in UK to offer G.Fast
According to this site: http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/fibre/f/4560598-fttpod-2nd-port.html?fpart=all
Hmmmm odd... didn't know that you could get that package on FTTP.
Still... 80/20 on FTTC is better than Virgin... so 80/20 on FTTP is even better... if you want more speed, get the 330/30 package - don't ruin your internets with Virgin.
FTTC @ 80/20 = 5-10ms ping with a decent provider like BT/Zen
FTTP @ 80/20 or 330/30 = 1-2ms ping
Virgin @ any speed = 20-30ms ping
Your general browsing of the web is a lot of small files to form a website... browsing with a 80mbit connection on a 2ms ping will be much much faster than with an 800mbit connection with 20ms ping.
This is so true. Even switching from your ISP DNS to a different DNS can speed up internet browsing because of the time it takes to resolve hosts. Google DNS has noticeably speed up my browsing.Hmmmm odd... didn't know that you could get that package on FTTP.
Still... 80/20 on FTTC is better than Virgin... so 80/20 on FTTP is even better... if you want more speed, get the 330/30 package - don't ruin your internets with Virgin.
FTTC @ 80/20 = 5-10ms ping with a decent provider like BT/Zen
FTTP @ 80/20 or 330/30 = 1-2ms ping
Virgin @ any speed = 20-30ms ping
Your general browsing of the web is a lot of small files to form a website... browsing with a 80mbit connection on a 2ms ping will be much much faster than with an 800mbit connection with 20ms ping.
As pointed out over at Think Broadband, the monthly cost is undoubtedly a pricing error. They would be selling the service at a loss.I just checked and BT say our exchange/cabinet are now offering FTTP on demand. It's a shame it's not readily accessible as I'd love it (if only to get rid of VM's ridiculous ping and jitter issues). Cerberus - linked above - say about £1,500 for install and then ~£70 a month. TBH I'd seriously consider it, as once it's installed you've got it for life. If it wasn't for my wife's family ties I'd move house for Gigaclear symmetric 1Gbps in a heartbeat...
I just checked and BT say our exchange/cabinet are now offering FTTP on demand. It's a shame it's not readily accessible as I'd love it (if only to get rid of VM's ridiculous ping and jitter issues). Cerberus - linked above - say about £1,500 for install and then ~£70 a month. TBH I'd seriously consider it, as once it's installed you've got it for life. If it wasn't for my wife's family ties I'd move house for Gigaclear symmetric 1Gbps in a heartbeat...
No, all FTTPoD are monthly charge of £300+ vat. There is no way you getting it for around £70 a month as Openreach won't allow this. The isp are mistaken pricing in error.
FTTP is becoming more and more of a priority on my list of wants when I move, with the onset of UHD content I don't particularly enjoy waiting hours to download a film on an 80/20 connection and sometimes streaming said content will buffer although this could be down something else, it will also prove incredibly handy if I continue to work from home. Current prices though are something I'm not willing to stomach so hopefully our government gives Openreach a kick up the arse, I have no idea why we're behind countries like Romania.
Not if they are making it back another way. The ISP can presumably charge whatever they want to the customer, within reason.
How on earth are they making up a £200+ loss each month?
I think FTTPoD could have worked when the full install cost was paid by the customer but then the monthly rental was the same as normal FTTP, it just needed ISPs prepared to push it, and the price would have dropped over time. That sort of monthly spend just isn't worth it.
Completely ridiculous statement.
Just to be clear, Openreach should completely fund the cost of FTTP to every household in the UK?
People are so misinformed that's the problem.
BT actually proposed an FTTP rollout a few years ago but this was turned down due to the amount of time it would take.The governement/Ofcom were after a quick fix.