Gamefreak501 said:A full frame camera will always have 'true' wide angle and telephoto results.
However, a 1.5 or 1.6 crop factor will add that much on top of every focal length, be it wide, standard or telephoto.
Digital users always find that their smaller sensors give them more reach, i.e. a 50mm lens will become an 80mm lens, a 22mm lens will become 35.2mm and a 75-300mm lens will become a 120-480mm lens.
But that gives a disadvantage to anyone who wishes to take landscape photography, or indeed anything which involves wide angles.
Gamefreak501 said:If you can afford the extra for the 5D, you should get it!
Gamefreak501 said:I suppose one thing to also mention is, by getting standard lenses, you are taking full advantage of the glass. If you then use the standard lens on a digital 1.5 or 1.6 body, you still get uniform quality but I think all lenses suffer from a fall of quality towards the edges, the full frame just shows this up a lot more.
yak.h'cir said:I dont think whats been posted is the exact truth.
You don't lose out on zoom with a full frame, all the 1.6crop factor does is crop the centre part of the image! I.e. if you take the same picture on the same lens with a full frame and a 1.6crop all you need to do is crop the centre of the picture taken on the full frame and then you have the same image. The "extra zoom" is not a + point for 1.6x! You've just got an automatic digital zoom taking place.
Well thats how i understand it anyway.
mrgubby said:To save the cost of upgrading my 300D to a 5D for the wide-angle landscape shots I just stand 1.6x further away.....