• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

G-SYNC Vs FREESYNC VS Adaptive-Sync

Caporegime
Joined
27 Nov 2005
Posts
25,368
Location
Guernsey
Can someone here explain what the differences are going be between these three

Nvidia = G-SYNC

AMD = FREESYNC

VESA Open standard = Adaptive-Sync......(VESA has officially added a feature called Adaptive-Sync to the DisplayPort 1.2a specification, which means that a G-Sync-style adaptive refresh mechanism could be built into nearly every new desktop monitor in the coming months and years.)
 
Last edited:
The Difference at this moment we cant say till FreeSync is release and tested. But if we go by what AMD is saying, FreeSync could be the better of the two..

AMD say "Not Me" That Freesync has faster latency because they is no two-way hand-shake between the devices what this mean we will after wait and see..
Freesync also could offer more refresh rate ranges in what the Sync will still perform well. Gsync I think below 30fps you notice the effect decrease.

How is Project FreeSync different from NVIDIA G-Sync?
"​There are three key advantages Project FreeSync holds over G-Sync: no licensing fees for adoption, no expensive or proprietary hardware modules, and no communication overhead.
The last benefit is essential to gamers, as Project FreeSync does not need to poll or wait on the display in order to determine when it’s safe to send the next frame to the monitor.
Project FreeSync uses industry-standard DisplayPort Adaptive-Sync protocols to pre-negotiate supported min/max refresh rates during plug’n’play, which means frame presentation to the user will never be delayed or impaired by time-consuming two-way handshakes."

that's all we have to go by for now. And Adaptive-sync is amd Freesync.
 
Last edited:
It's an optional part of the VESA standard.

There's one monitor at the moment on OCUK that's been "upgraded" vendor side with the scaler for Adaptive Sync, which means AMD can use Freesync with it. Although it still needs a Firmware update (Needs sending to the Manufacturer). That 4k from Ilyama or whatever they're called. But you couldn't just walk out with it now and run Freesync on it.
 
gsync - proprietary solution, all designs go through nvidia, refers to both hardware implementation and driver implementation
async - VESA standard to accomplish same thing on other panels
freesync - AMD's driver implementation, monitor makers use async standard to roll their own hardware implementation

Hope that's concise enough for ya
 
Proprietary is not a dirty word, there's no sniping in my explanation!

Why call one prop but not the other?

I don't think prop is a dirty word, but if you're going to use it for one, you'd use it for the other, since that's what it is.
Also, what's with the defensive rage :p
 
And Adaptive-sync is amd Freesync.
But aren't AMD making out that Freesysnc is meant to be there own special thing....:confused:

Now it Sounds more like AMD just trying to steal the credit from VESA Adding Adaptive-sync to the DisplayPort 1.2a specification...
 
Last edited:
It's not so much that - more AMDs way of enabling the technology. Freesync is AMDs proprietary solution to utilise Adaptive Sync. Gsync is nVidia's all in one solution.
 
But aren't AMD making out that Freesysnc is meant to be there own special thing....:confused:

Now it Sounds more like AMD just trying to steal the credit from VESA Adding Adaptive-sync to the DisplayPort 1.2a specification...

No Freesync is AMDs drivers, Adaptive-Sync is part of the display port.
 
Adaptive-Sync isn't.. Anyone can write a driver and use it.

Yes? And that's not what I said.
I'm well aware Adaptive Sync isn't.
I use my words carefully and explicitly.

Although I wish people would stop saying "Write a driver". They can't just "Write a driver" there needs to be hardware support there first lol.
 
Back
Top Bottom