• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

GameGPU test Borderlands 2: The Pre-sequel

Caporegime
Joined
24 Sep 2008
Posts
38,287
Location
Essex innit!
Our video cards were tested at resolutions of 1920x1080, 2560x1600 and 3840h2160 at maximum graphics quality settings allowed Borderlands - The Pre-Sequel. SLI and AMD CrossFireX currently have excellent support for the game. Common tests for graphics cards and processors were at low settings of physics (at acceleration physics and the CPU when the system AMD cards other settings are not available).

24a1310f17a55c35e4cf3757bbd14811.jpg


e657deb7b5f6ef2e7fafa2b396300f18.jpg


ef018747f77dc81d1ce4784bccffbda9.jpg


b353556a0cb5e0eeb4c87c58a4f8ccef.jpg

http://gamegpu.ru/action-/-fps-/-tps/borderlands-the-pre-sequel-test-gpu.html

Surprised to see the 780Ti beating out the 980 and even the age old Titan beating out the 290X. Playable for even older GPUs, so good work and a good fun game :)
 
It's literally a slideshow with physX on without an Nvidia card. Same at Arkham Asylum.

If they bothered to make a driver for them a modern CPU would have no problem doing those calculations. But that's Nvidia for you I guess.

Well that makes no sense, when people use PhysX in Borderlands 2 for example, they have reported some slow downs, even with high end nVidia cards, so how are nVidia supposed to cater for it on a 4/6 or even 8 core CPU and why should they?
 
Back
Top Bottom