• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Geforce GTX1180/2080 Speculation thread

So with all the comments so far:

Rtx 2070 equals the gtx 1080ti minus 10%, similar to how the 1070 matched the 980ti. The suggested rtx2070 price is $499 but probably be £499 plus more for custom cards here.

The gtx 2060 is a rebranded gtx 1080, with all those spare pascal gp104 boards knocking around from overproduction. It be £399 plus here.

Or it could be a new turing chip without the rtx features.

If you snag a cheap gtx 1080 under 400 quid, you got a bargain.
 
Last edited:
Rtx 2070 equals the gtx 1080ti ish, similar to how the 1070 matched the 980ti. You can pick up a new 1080ti for 635, the suggested rtx2070 price is $599 but probably be £599 here plus more for custom cards.

If the configuration is anything to go by I think the 2070 will come up a little short of the 1080ti generally though might give it a run in some cases. (Things like TMUs, ROPS and memory bandwidth, etc. still have significant considerations for traditional rendering even with architecture improvements and clock speed will have some impact there as well).
 
He highlighted the bit where they point out "And there's a cost to either delaying your purchase or getting an older-generation product so you can save money." and basically replied "Durr, There's a cost to saving money? Hurr Hurr" >.> That was the point I turned it off lol.
I didn't think his rebuttal was that great either.

Obvs "cost" doesn't have to be financial.

But, that said, what exactly is the "cost" of not being an early adopter? E-peen cost? Not top of the "roll of honour" cost?

Even if we acknowledge that we're not talking about monetary cost, what exactly are we talking about?
 
Ml
If the configuration is anything to go by I think the 2070 will come up a little short of the 1080ti generally though might give it a run in some cases. (Things like TMUs, ROPS and memory bandwidth, etc. still have significant considerations for traditional rendering even with architecture improvements and clock speed will have some impact there as well).

Yes spot on. Just hope I did the right thing getting a cheap gtx 1070ti for 340, I game at 1080p. I can see the gtx 2060 matching the gtx1070ti/80 for £399.
 
I turned it off halfway through, I'm not sure if Steve was pretending to not understand what he was reading so he could mock it or if he's just a little too young to get it but it annoyed me lol.

Other than the take on saving money which was both wrong and right with a bit of misunderstanding but I think intentionally done to mock the rest was pretty much on point.

GN probably hasn't got to the point yet but the likes of some of the others have got to the point where they get a dedicated manager, etc. from YouTube and access to a lot more resources on a case by case basis if it furthers both their channel and what YouTube want to develop which has kind of mixed impact and can sometimes ruin what was otherwise a decent home grown effort.
 
Ml


Yes spot on. Just hope I did the right thing getting a cheap gtx 1070ti for 340, I game at 1080p. I can see the gtx 2060 matching the gtx1070ti/80 for £399.
Well a £400 card should really match a £500 card of the previous gen.

Let's be clear tho... if the 2060 is £400, it's not a mainstream card anymore. Mid-range, yes, but not mainstream.

That means mainstream is now the 2050 or even below the 2050.
 
But, that said, what exactly is the "cost" of not being an early adopter? E-peen cost? Not top of the "roll of honour" cost?

Even if we acknowledge that we're not talking about monetary cost, what exactly are we talking about?

He answered that in his article. Quote here

When your whole life flashes before your eyes, how much of it do you want to not have ray tracing?

:p
 
Ok guys I found some numbers on a 2080 TI. Now take a depth breath here. It's for a unreleased game. A game that is said to use Ray Tracing. However, looking at the screen it doesn't seem like it's enabled.
Furthermore, this is on a triple HDTV setup. Roughly 90 FPS. We don't know how the 1080 TI/1080/FuryX cards perform in this unreleased game as of yet. They will release a demo in early September 2018.


You gotta watch the whole thing. In time you will see the RTX in the case.

Disclaimer:
This might be a marketing tactic. As I didn't see AI cars in the background which would impact framerates for racing games like this.
 
Wonder if that could be good news for consumers.

Partners with masses of stock, that they really want to sell. 20xx series imminent.

Normally that would mean some nice deals to be had. Although with 20xx prices maybe not.

But at some point, if mining demand really is low these days, they will need to sell these cards to gamers. Now I'd imagine that most people who wanted to buy a 10xx series card at current prices already has done so.
 
The ending is the scary part


In nvidia's ideal world they would be the only one producing geforce cards, in the past they needed partners as they were smaller, now they're much bigger partners basically need to bend over and do what they're told. They misread the crypto market, ordered a load more cards (allegedly in excess of 300k) and got stuck with them as the mining bubble shrunk. Now they're passing the blame around it seems. 3dfx tried the same thing when they bought stb as they wanted everything in house, though financially they were in a really bad position. With nvidia now overclocking their own cards and producing what was previously AIB style coolers it'll be interesting to see if any of their current partners either jump ship or get elbowed out entirely.
 
Back
Top Bottom