Getting Flash player to work in Firefox on 64bit Ubuntu

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
20,563
Location
UK
If this issue has been covered before, I apologise. I did a search but only found a few bits of info which didn't solve my problem.

I have just installed the newest version of Ubuntu onto my computer and cannot get Flash player to work with Firefox. From my research I am led to believe that it does not support 64bit browsers.

The two options I have tried so far are:
1- Install a thingymajig which makes Flash compatible with 64bit Firefox. This didn't work.

2 - Install an older version of Firefox (2.*) as it should be 32bit and therefore compatible. I have tried but I cannot get it to install.

Please excuse my n00bness as it has been a long time since I dabbled with Linux (Slackware and Smoothwall about 5 or 6 years ago) and my knowledge isn't quite up to scratch.

Is there a step-by-step guide out there in simple enough language for a newb like me to follow or if not could someone help me out?

Many thanks :)
 
Should work fine on 64-bit FF3 - that's what I'm using and it's OK for me.

Have you tried using the "flashplugin-nonfree" in the repository? You should be able to just search for that - although you may need to amend your list of repositories if you've not already done so, in order to search the non-open source stuff.

I don't think I did anything else apart from install it via Synaptic, and if I can manage it then anyone can.
 
The way that I do it is also probably the easiest. Install the
ubuntu-restricted-extras
metapackage and it'll set everything up for you. It uses a wrapper to use the 32-bit Flash plugin on a 64-bit browser, but you can't tell unless you check running processes while it's running. It should do all the setup for you. It did for me and I never had to think about it again.

So that's:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-restricted-extras
 
Running FF3 on Ubuntu 64-bit v8.04 LTS Live CD.

Went to youtube, got the yellow banner at the top, installed Adobe Flash Player through that....works fine.
 
Should work fine on 64-bit FF3 - that's what I'm using and it's OK for me.

Have you tried using the "flashplugin-nonfree" in the repository? You should be able to just search for that - although you may need to amend your list of repositories if you've not already done so, in order to search the non-open source stuff.

I don't think I did anything else apart from install it via Synaptic, and if I can manage it then anyone can.
I have found but I don't know how to install it. Do I just navigate to the folder in terminal and type "./filename.so"? Because when I do that I get "Segmentation error".



The way that I do it is also probably the easiest. Install the
ubuntu-restricted-extras
metapackage and it'll set everything up for you. It uses a wrapper to use the 32-bit Flash plugin on a 64-bit browser, but you can't tell unless you check running processes while it's running. It should do all the setup for you. It did for me and I never had to think about it again.

So that's:
sudo apt-get install ubuntu-restricted-extras
Thanks Billy, I have installed the extras now but when I go to install Flash player from the .tar.gz download, I still get the error "The installer does not support x64 architecture".



Running FF3 on Ubuntu 64-bit v8.04 LTS Live CD.

Went to youtube, got the yellow banner at the top, installed Adobe Flash Player through that....works fine.
When I go to Youtube, I don't get the yellow banner at the top of Firefox. Instead, where the video applet should be there's a message saying "You either have Javascript disabled or are running an older version of Adobe Flash."


I'm probably missing something really obvious here.
Thanks for your help guys :)
 
Thanks Billy, I have installed the extras now but when I go to install Flash player from the .tar.gz download, I still get the error "The installer does not support x64 architecture".
Everything about Ubuntu is easier if you just use the packages in the repos and not screw around downloading installers and such. :)

You'll come around! :p
 
That's a rare case though, where the repo is enough out of date that it matters and you need the newer version. Even then it's easier to grab a .deb from the maintainer (or a .rpm for use with alien).

And I never said it was better or worst, I just said it was easier. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom