Goal or not?

cheets64 · 8 Feb 2011 at 13:58

Skip to 48seconds

Just over I think.

elmuzzy66. · 8 Feb 2011 at 14:45

Is wigan'a football so poor that you have resorted to watch the costa rica 1st division

Stewy · 8 Feb 2011 at 15:08

Without technology you can't give those

Pigeon_Killer · 8 Feb 2011 at 15:10

StewartMG said:
Without technology you can't give those

What the game needs is more respect for referees not technology

Psycho Sonny · 8 Feb 2011 at 15:13

this is why i dont understand how they cannot put a chip inside the ball, and add sensors to players shirts and goalposts.

therefore you can use the above technology for offsides, goals, etc. and have zero problems or without the use of replays.

Dutch Guy · 8 Feb 2011 at 15:13

Crap metal bar at the back of the goal causing the confusion.

Cosimo · 8 Feb 2011 at 15:18

Goal, what goal.

nydryl · 8 Feb 2011 at 19:13

Psycho Sonny said:
this is why i dont understand how they cannot put a chip inside the ball, and add sensors to players shirts and goalposts.

therefore you can use the above technology for offsides, goals, etc. and have zero problems or without the use of replays.

That would be so so boring. Pray to god nothing like that ever happens. Controversial decisions make football a more exciting game to watch.

Dutch Guy · 9 Feb 2011 at 08:24

nydryl said:
Controversial decisions make football a more exciting game to watch.

Disagree totally, controversial (i.e. wrong) decisions are damaging, irritating, annoying, unfair and game wrecking.

K1LLSW1TCH · 9 Feb 2011 at 08:31

Dunno why they don't just use Hawkeye.