GOOD air combat sim?

J86 · 12 Apr 2008 at 19:24

I hear Falcon 4.0 isnt too bad..

I used to play that IF-22 or whatever it was by novalogic, was immense online.

So yeah.. id like a new air combat sim i can play online with some pals.. graphics need to be good really with modern jets not ancient bangers

any ideas?

ta

Dano · 12 Apr 2008 at 19:35

LOMAC

Nate--IRL-- · 12 Apr 2008 at 19:36

<....sound of rapidly appoaching footsteps from a distance.....>

Lock On: Modern Air Combat. www.lockon.co.uk

Nate

Azagoth · 12 Apr 2008 at 19:52

LOMAC or Falcon 4.0: Allied Force

Pandion · 12 Apr 2008 at 20:38

I prefer Falcon as you can use a 2d cockpit to set things up, in LOMAC it's a 3D non usable cockpit where you have to remember to many key commands.

Bobario · 13 Apr 2008 at 10:34

IL2 Sturmovik 1946 for propheads and Lomac or Falcon 4.0 Allied Force for the jets.

Edinho · 13 Apr 2008 at 12:14

LOMAC - only problem is you need a memory like a Russian chess champion.

Firegod · 13 Apr 2008 at 12:19

I've got some amazing LOMAC user videos. If anyone has some FTP space or something I'll try and upload them for people to see. Not too sure if they are still on the net somewhere....

Briton · 14 Apr 2008 at 15:33

WWII Online.

Dano · 14 Apr 2008 at 15:42

graphics need to be good really with modern jets not ancient bangers

How hard is it to read the OP?

Indy500 · 14 Apr 2008 at 15:44

Firegod said:
I've got some amazing LOMAC user videos. If anyone has some FTP space or something I'll try and upload them for people to see. Not too sure if they are still on the net somewhere....

Just use Rapidshare?

MotherMayI · 14 Apr 2008 at 16:35

Briton said:
WWII Online.

<3

Briton · 14 Apr 2008 at 19:18

Dano said:
How hard is it to read the OP?

Yeah my bad. Thanks for pointing out in that catty way though. In my defence I saw IL2 Sturmovik mentioned in the thread and WWII Online is the only Sim mentioned with meaningful combat.

Dano · 14 Apr 2008 at 19:45

Well you blatantly didn't read it whatsoever did you, so you deserved it tbh, as for meaningful combat, heh they're all games so no, none of it is meaningful whatsoever including WWII Online

Devlish · 14 Apr 2008 at 19:48

Dano said:
Well you blatantly didn't read it whatsoever did you, so you deserved it tbh, as for meaningful combat, heh they're all games so no, none of it is meaningful whatsoever including WWII Online

OMG youre an ass.

Briton · 14 Apr 2008 at 19:50

Dano said:
Well you blatantly didn't read it whatsoever did you, so you deserved it tbh, as for meaningful combat, heh they're all games so no, none of it is meaningful whatsoever including WWII Online

Believe me, it is to some of them.

Devlish · 14 Apr 2008 at 19:52

well if it isnt meaningful to you, one might wonder why youre wasting your time doing it?

Timdog · 14 Apr 2008 at 19:54

Sleepless said:
well if it isnt meaningful to you, one might wonder why youre wasting your time doing it?

fun? i reckon thats why most people play games

Devlish · 14 Apr 2008 at 19:58

Timdog plz and thanks said:
fun? i reckon thats why most people play games

Sigh, meaningful to you, not to the good of society. Games are a waste of time unless theyre meaningful to you. I HIGHLY doubt he meant that wwiiol cures cancer.

Dano · 14 Apr 2008 at 20:04

Sleepless said:
Sigh, meaningful to you, not to the good of society. Games are a waste of time unless theyre meaningful to you. I HIGHLY doubt he meant that wwiiol cures cancer.

And you called me an ass?!