• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

got fx-55, upgrade? to 4400x2 worthwhile?

Associate
Joined
4 Aug 2003
Posts
1,592
Location
North Down
Hi

As the title says the wifes PC has a FX-55 Clawhammer in it on an Abit AV8-3rd EYE mobo. Has 2gb RAM. With the drop in prices of the s939 dualcore athlon 64's I thought it might be a good idea to upgrade. The FX-55 is running at stock for stability, hench why I was thinking of the 4400+ which runs at 2.4 and has the 1MB cache per core.

She is always complaining it is too slow and is very impatient, hence the thought of upgrading?

What you think?

K
 
wouldnt upgrade to a x2 4400 as they are getting phased out with the new lineup i think, how about getting a x2 3800 and then just ocing it to the same speeds?
 
The motherboard doesnt oc well, therefore better to have a higher stock speed. I know AM2 have superceeded s939, but that doesnt mean its no a useless platform.

Would I see a noticable benefit going dualcore at 2.4 from single core at 2.6 ?
 
goreblast said:
{snip}She is always complaining it is too slow and is very impatient, hence the thought of upgrading?{snip}
lol... slow in doing what if you don't mind me asking? Because thats a very fast chip :D

Anyway, to compare the two see here :cool:
 
i know FX-55 should demolish any other athlon 64, why on earth you not overclocking it may i ask, should have a little more to give with good cooling :confused:
 
I would have thought you would definately see a diffrence in 'day to day' tasks as the Dual core can ran more than one task at a time without the inherent slow down of single core. I know I saw a difference although I would have preffered a difference in gaming rather than desktop applications. :rolleyes:
 
w3bbo said:
I would have thought you would definately see a diffrence in 'day to day' tasks as the Dual core can ran more than one task at a time without the inherent slow down of single core. I know I saw a difference although I would have preffered a difference in gaming rather than desktop applications. :rolleyes:
Another vote for yes here mate. Even if the X2 doesnt clock the dual core makes everything feel zippier
 
Back
Top Bottom