Hi,
Long time reader, first time poster... So please go easy on me!
I am not a PC gamer in the slightest... Only ever dabbled a while ago with GTA3 and Vice City, but I never fully converted from consoles (PS2). Battlefield 3, however, is awful on consoles and I have grown sick of the controller (Ps3 controller still beats the 360 however), and so I have decided to build a semi cheap gaming PC.
Thankfully, its Christmas very soon and my birthday a week afterwards. And, as a student, I have a student loan (more accurately, an overdraft) to spend on suitable things (PC is suitable isnt it?). Not to mention a £500 boost in the form of a scholarship mid way through February... Im therefore doing fairly well financially. With that in mind, I want to build a decent gaming PC... not a super computer, but a fairly good one which should be able to play BF3 on high settings and, possibly in the future, ultra settings (with a second graphics chip)
A budget of around £700 - £800 (at a push) should result in a decent system. That does mean no top of the range CPU or Graphics card, but a decent one non the less.
Games I will play:
BF3, FSx (will eventually overclock CPU for this), skyrim, etc.
I should start with posting my potential set up. Maybe some pennies can be saved here and there, or some areas may need improving.
CPU: i5 2500k - £168 - Im not budging from the i5. This CPU gets amazing reviews, amazing performance and is overclockable (though I intend not too just yet, but the option is always nice). AMD maybe cheaper, but I just cant see any reason to go with one.
Motherboard: £92 -msi-p67a-gd53-b3-p67
In honesty, I have not spent much time looking at motherboards (Silly I know). Im therefore open to suggestions on an alternative.
RAM: £36 - g-skill-8gb-2x4gb-ddr3-1600mhz-ripjawsx-memory-kit-cl9-9-9-9-24
Cheap and cheerful... Will likely upgrade in the future.
PSU: £31 - cit-700w-black-edition-psu
Not really sure on this one... Seems a little too cheap. 700W should do me thinks. When I come to upgrading this rig, I will buy a bigger PSU, but for now... A cheap one will do wont it?
Case: £64 - antec-dark-fleet-df35-mid-tower-case
Though, I have just read that the largest graphics card it can hold is 11.5''. I fear that most good cards will be too big for this case, and therefore, I may need an upgrade. DF 85 looks a cool option. Or the Antec 1200... I would prefer the green LED version from here, but I cant justify paying £185 im afraid.
That leaves a HDD (not SSD - cant afford it just yet. One for the future) and optical drive to buy (no need for blue ray, PS3 will do for Blue rays). Anything else I have forgot other than the graphics chip?
I already own a 1080p monitor.
Mouse and keyboard are needed, but wont be part of the budget.
That, therefore leaves a graphics card. This has had me unbelievably confused for a few days... I simply can not make my mind up between ATI or Nevada, and then there is the factory overclocked versions on top of that!!
I was originally was sold on the GTX 560 - Best bang for buck processor i have heard. I can pick up the gigabyte OC version of this for £150 on ******. Indeed, my mate has this (not had any feedback from him though).
Then, there is the 560TI. 5-10% better apparently. Plus, the version I like the look of has 2GB of VRAM.
Slightly higher up in the price bracket is the 560 448 core series. Comes with 1.3gb of Vram... Is this enough? I have heard that 1GB isn going to cut the mustard anymore, especially with BF3 on high settings (1080p)... Will 1.3gb be enough then??
Even further up the ladder is the GTX 570. In honesty, this has me more than tempted.
I can pick up an Asus GTX 570 for £240.
On the other hand, the HD6950 or HD6970.
I havnt looked in the HD6950 too much. I have heard its okay and seen a few benchmarks to suggest it performs alright. Take this one, for example. A little cheaper than a 560ti...
The HD6970... Benchmarks suggest this thing is a beast. Out performs the GTX 580 on BF3, though dies as soon as MSAA is applied.
All other benchmarks put it very close to the GTX 570.
So I can afford the HD6970 (If bought, I can pick up 1tb HDD for about 60 quid... that would be very helpful indeed!) or GTX 570. But which one?
HD6970 Pros:
1) 2GB Vram
2) Fast benchmarks... similar to GTX 580 in BF3, and similar, if not slightly better,than the GTX 570 on others.
3) Decent price, happy to pay £260 + get the hard drive cheap.
HD6970 neg:
1) I have heard nothing but negative reviews of the drivers ATI offer.
2) BF3 benchmark on Toms Hardware pointed out the fact these cards had some serious issues even getting the game running!
3) Adding MSAA in BF3 kills frame rates
4) Hawx 2, a game which has a high degree of tessalations, killed the HD series of cards.
GTX 570 pro:
1) MUCH better drivers
2) Solid benchmark results... 60FPS on high settings is more than enough for an ex console gamer for BF3!!... It maybe 10 or so behind the HD6970
3) MSAA doesnt kill the cards performance
GTX 570 neg:
1) Lacking in VRam...
2) Reviews suggest that the HD6970 is more powerful piece of kit.
So, im stuck... Which to get? The GTX 570 or HD6970??? Or should I go for something else all together.
The system will cost me aprox: £750. leaving some room for improvement to the mobo or case. Or, if I have forgotten something very important.
Thanks,
Dan
EDIT: Forgot to ask... I fancy one of these factory overclocks... Prices vary so I will likely pick the cheapest one. As an example, sapphire HD6970 is £259 whilst the asus GTX 570 is £340 (competed to gigabytes version at £278). Any brands I should avoid with these two cards in particular.
(sorry for long post)
Long time reader, first time poster... So please go easy on me!
I am not a PC gamer in the slightest... Only ever dabbled a while ago with GTA3 and Vice City, but I never fully converted from consoles (PS2). Battlefield 3, however, is awful on consoles and I have grown sick of the controller (Ps3 controller still beats the 360 however), and so I have decided to build a semi cheap gaming PC.
Thankfully, its Christmas very soon and my birthday a week afterwards. And, as a student, I have a student loan (more accurately, an overdraft) to spend on suitable things (PC is suitable isnt it?). Not to mention a £500 boost in the form of a scholarship mid way through February... Im therefore doing fairly well financially. With that in mind, I want to build a decent gaming PC... not a super computer, but a fairly good one which should be able to play BF3 on high settings and, possibly in the future, ultra settings (with a second graphics chip)
A budget of around £700 - £800 (at a push) should result in a decent system. That does mean no top of the range CPU or Graphics card, but a decent one non the less.
Games I will play:
BF3, FSx (will eventually overclock CPU for this), skyrim, etc.
I should start with posting my potential set up. Maybe some pennies can be saved here and there, or some areas may need improving.
CPU: i5 2500k - £168 - Im not budging from the i5. This CPU gets amazing reviews, amazing performance and is overclockable (though I intend not too just yet, but the option is always nice). AMD maybe cheaper, but I just cant see any reason to go with one.
Motherboard: £92 -msi-p67a-gd53-b3-p67
In honesty, I have not spent much time looking at motherboards (Silly I know). Im therefore open to suggestions on an alternative.
RAM: £36 - g-skill-8gb-2x4gb-ddr3-1600mhz-ripjawsx-memory-kit-cl9-9-9-9-24
Cheap and cheerful... Will likely upgrade in the future.
PSU: £31 - cit-700w-black-edition-psu
Not really sure on this one... Seems a little too cheap. 700W should do me thinks. When I come to upgrading this rig, I will buy a bigger PSU, but for now... A cheap one will do wont it?
Case: £64 - antec-dark-fleet-df35-mid-tower-case
Though, I have just read that the largest graphics card it can hold is 11.5''. I fear that most good cards will be too big for this case, and therefore, I may need an upgrade. DF 85 looks a cool option. Or the Antec 1200... I would prefer the green LED version from here, but I cant justify paying £185 im afraid.
That leaves a HDD (not SSD - cant afford it just yet. One for the future) and optical drive to buy (no need for blue ray, PS3 will do for Blue rays). Anything else I have forgot other than the graphics chip?
I already own a 1080p monitor.
Mouse and keyboard are needed, but wont be part of the budget.
That, therefore leaves a graphics card. This has had me unbelievably confused for a few days... I simply can not make my mind up between ATI or Nevada, and then there is the factory overclocked versions on top of that!!
I was originally was sold on the GTX 560 - Best bang for buck processor i have heard. I can pick up the gigabyte OC version of this for £150 on ******. Indeed, my mate has this (not had any feedback from him though).
Then, there is the 560TI. 5-10% better apparently. Plus, the version I like the look of has 2GB of VRAM.
Slightly higher up in the price bracket is the 560 448 core series. Comes with 1.3gb of Vram... Is this enough? I have heard that 1GB isn going to cut the mustard anymore, especially with BF3 on high settings (1080p)... Will 1.3gb be enough then??
Even further up the ladder is the GTX 570. In honesty, this has me more than tempted.
I can pick up an Asus GTX 570 for £240.
On the other hand, the HD6950 or HD6970.
I havnt looked in the HD6950 too much. I have heard its okay and seen a few benchmarks to suggest it performs alright. Take this one, for example. A little cheaper than a 560ti...
The HD6970... Benchmarks suggest this thing is a beast. Out performs the GTX 580 on BF3, though dies as soon as MSAA is applied.
All other benchmarks put it very close to the GTX 570.
So I can afford the HD6970 (If bought, I can pick up 1tb HDD for about 60 quid... that would be very helpful indeed!) or GTX 570. But which one?
HD6970 Pros:
1) 2GB Vram
2) Fast benchmarks... similar to GTX 580 in BF3, and similar, if not slightly better,than the GTX 570 on others.
3) Decent price, happy to pay £260 + get the hard drive cheap.
HD6970 neg:
1) I have heard nothing but negative reviews of the drivers ATI offer.
2) BF3 benchmark on Toms Hardware pointed out the fact these cards had some serious issues even getting the game running!
3) Adding MSAA in BF3 kills frame rates
4) Hawx 2, a game which has a high degree of tessalations, killed the HD series of cards.
GTX 570 pro:
1) MUCH better drivers
2) Solid benchmark results... 60FPS on high settings is more than enough for an ex console gamer for BF3!!... It maybe 10 or so behind the HD6970
3) MSAA doesnt kill the cards performance
GTX 570 neg:
1) Lacking in VRam...
2) Reviews suggest that the HD6970 is more powerful piece of kit.
So, im stuck... Which to get? The GTX 570 or HD6970??? Or should I go for something else all together.
The system will cost me aprox: £750. leaving some room for improvement to the mobo or case. Or, if I have forgotten something very important.

Thanks,
Dan
EDIT: Forgot to ask... I fancy one of these factory overclocks... Prices vary so I will likely pick the cheapest one. As an example, sapphire HD6970 is £259 whilst the asus GTX 570 is £340 (competed to gigabytes version at £278). Any brands I should avoid with these two cards in particular.
(sorry for long post)
Last edited: