• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

GTX 1060 To Be Announced on 7th July ?

Associate
OP
Joined
8 Oct 2013
Posts
868
Looks cool, but don't expect it to do more than trade blows with the 480 imo.

Well the 480 is about (looking at day 0 benchmarks) 60% of a 1070 .... so it seems likely that the 1060 will be at least at the performance level of the 480... but (if power draw scales properly nvidia side) with a much lower power draw
 
Associate
OP
Joined
8 Oct 2013
Posts
868
Looking at pure "shader processor" count :-

the 960 retail had 1024 vs the 970's 1664, this is 61% of the 970.

now running the same thing on 1070 (with its 1920 processor count) gives us :-

1920 * 0.61 = 1171.

Im gunna make a wild guess of a processor count for the 1060 of around 1280 to make it slightly better than the rx-480 ;)


NOTE i know very well that the shader processor isnt 1:1 with the overall performance of a card or haw gpu arch scales .... just musing and getting a ballpark idea :p
 
Associate
OP
Joined
8 Oct 2013
Posts
868
Some specs leaked:

http://videocardz.com/61753/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-specifications-leaked-faster-than-rx-480

According to Nvidia's own slides around 15% faster than an RX480. Apparently according to the comments it is $299 - if that is the case it will be closer to £270 here then!!


That "Much Faster" graph over the Rx 480 puts is a bit of a joke. It shows 1.15 under performance, is that 1.15 x the speed of the 480 ? (axis need units .... whoever did that never did GCSE maths :|
)

But assuming the above 1.15 x RX 480 performance would put it just below the 980 in most benchmarks. But for $100 more ? should be sitting at $230 (taking the base $200 for the R9 480) or worst case $260 :|

So looks like it could be a bit faster for a bit more money :|
 
Back
Top Bottom