Associate
- Joined
- 15 Aug 2006
- Posts
- 1,764
- Location
- Leicester UK
No but a 55 plate would still fall into the lower tax category, which was my general point.[TW]Fox;15475565 said:No because there are no 05 plate Vectra VXR's.
No but a 55 plate would still fall into the lower tax category, which was my general point.[TW]Fox;15475565 said:No because there are no 05 plate Vectra VXR's.
No but a 55 plate would still fall into the lower tax category, which was my general point.


MG ZS180?
V6, lots of torque and a lovely noise. 30mpg+ to top it off, and reliable
You could get an 06 plate for £4k, and if you get bored supercharge it![]()


They are also far too slow for the OP.
MG ZS180?

In a straight line maybe, but in the corners I'd put money on a 180 beating the Vectra round the track.
Perfect example of champagne taste and beer money.
[TW]Fox;15476459 said:Wonder day you will look back and wonder why you wasted so much time being a Rover fanboy![]()
In a straight line maybe, but in the corners I'd put money on a 180 beating the Vectra round the track.
His VXR is 200bhp/ton, the Rover is 144. Cant see the Rover coming out on top really

How can anyone say a ZS180 is cheap? The £400 stupidtax and stupidly expensive cambelt service is enough reason to drop it.

Perfect example of champagne taste and beer money.
His VXR is 200bhp/ton, the Rover is 144. Cant see the Rover coming out on top really
