Might have a faulty CPU temp sensor, could be. But it should have shut my pc when it run Prime95 and hit 48C. Because surely the "real" temp could have being more than 70C (like before) if we assume that normally I have 25-40 as some have said, instead of 0C.
FYI this is from last week when had it at 4933 playing with the Overdrive, running the 2 stock Corsair fans + 2 no name ones.
and this from today (plugged the two magma that had removed) , dropping the OC to match the previous one for the sake of reference. (as I said initially, there is a spike before the pump kicks in at 100% but that happens with the stock fans also).
If you have 4 SP120 perfomance, put them all at 100% fan speed (connect them to molex) and idle your CPU at 0.8-0.9v, like the FX8350 does. My room temp is ~17C btw but you will not have issue with 20C
(I have the thermostat just outside the door and like the house cool)
Given the argument, plugged the 2 Magma that removed, and here is the Core temp screenshot after running the Crysis Benchmark. (32C max)
As for the lower temp that comes after the exhaust fans from the radiator, consider that the air comes with some speed & pressure.
Also when you compare AMD to Intel processors on cooling, they have different shaped surfaces, so if you have an Intel you might have higher temps than with an AMD one using the same setup.
You see the AMD are convex shaped while Intel are concave. None is flat.
Both generating heat at the centre of the CPU, however the AMD has better contact with the flat surface of the heatsink and better heat dissipation. While the Intel ones are more prone to air bubbles and need for higher amount of thermal transfer agent and not direct contact with the flat heat sink.
http://media.bestofmicro.com/6/2/395498/original/Heatspreader-Scheme.png
No hotlinking. Thank you.
So do not be so surprised if someone with AMD FX CPU comes around with better cooling than an Intel one with same config.