• Notice regarding image hosts and attachments. See here.

Halo 2 Delayed... AGAIN!

To best honest, the halo series collectively make the second best console FPS ever, goldeneye being the first. Compared to a PC FPS, they suffer enourmously, unless the combat is overhauled its just too easy to play a console fps on a PC due to the difference between mouse and gamepad. Also the levels are just so linear compared to the PCs best offerings... bah you get where i'm coming from, i'm going to bed.
 
Streeteh said:
To best honest, the halo series collectively make the second best console FPS ever, goldeneye being the first. Compared to a PC FPS, they suffer enourmously, unless the combat is overhauled its just too easy to play a console fps on a PC due to the difference between mouse and gamepad. Also the levels are just so linear compared to the PCs best offerings... bah you get where i'm coming from, i'm going to bed.
Click to expand...
Halo > Goldeneye > Halo 2
 
wow thats a painfully low score! Still I have never forgiven MS for stealing halo from the pc the first time round. Halo 1 was going to be so good when it was due to come out. Then along comes MS to steal it and remake it for the rubbish xbox which would have failed without it! Tut

(not bitter at all)
 
Ouch! 60% is shockingly low. I'll still try it just to see the improved visuals anyway. I'm betting the low score is attributed to MS' tacked-on awful Games for Live service. Nobody wants to pay for half the featureset commonly found in PC multiplayer games for free. Not even EA does that.

Halo > Goldeneye > Halo 2 anyway.
 
hopefully it was a typo and should have stated 0% , truly one of if not the most overhyped awful fps made, keep it on the consoles thanks
 
It would have been worth 80% 2 years ago. Knock off 10% for the 2 year delay, another 10% for making an xbox port DX10 only, and another 10% for Microsoft taking the mickey mouse out of PC gamers.
 
KNiVES said:
Ouch! 60% is shockingly low. I'll still try it just to see the improved visuals anyway. I'm betting the low score is attributed to MS' tacked-on awful Games for Live service. Nobody wants to pay for half the featureset commonly found in PC multiplayer games for free. Not even EA does that.

Halo > Goldeneye > Halo 2 anyway.
Click to expand...

Don't give EA any more bad ideas - haven't they already tried to copy valve with an electronic distribution system EA link is it ? If Microsoft have any measure of success with their games for windows live service you can bet the execs at EA will be watching it closely as another source of revenue.

bfar said:
It would have been worth 80% 2 years ago. Knock off 10% for the 2 year delay, another 10% for making an xbox port DX10 only, and another 10% for Microsoft taking the mickey mouse out of PC gamers.
Click to expand...

It's not DX10 only - its Vista only, you will still be able to play it if you have a dx9 card.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom