Happy Pride Weekend!

Read the article then: it's quite interesting, and isn't actually 'about' homosexuality - that's just an example of the data interpretation.

After reading, you would see that it was actually dealing with USA only. States less tolerant to homosexuality had gay searches at 4.8%, more tolerant at 5.2%. Suspicion was that the discrepancy was covered by geographic pull towards tolerant states (gay people move to these areas, you see), but blows your 'especially if they come from communities or countries where being openly gay isn't tolerated' out of the water

I've had a look through, I'm still not convinced that it is a reasonable assumption re: similar levels of porn consumption... it certainly doesn't blow my objection out of the water. Just because some states are more tolerant (from a legal perspective re: marriage etc..) than others doesn't mean that society as a whole treats homosexuality and heterosexuality in the same way, the objection is still valid.

ref: Pakistan - forum rules prevent linking here due to the search terms involved but for example here are the results for 'man ****ing man'

ZgbIWK6.png
 
ref: Pakistan - forum rules prevent linking here due to the search terms involved but for example here are the results for 'man ****ing man'

ZgbIWK6.png
That's kind of interesting, though I can't imagine the search term "man ******* man" has much traction in countries which have a more widely used homosexual lexicon.
 
Get a grip, cant you be happy for other people or is it all to much for you. do you fell out of place in 2017, well its lucky white straight (as long as theirs no kids) christian (rich) men have had the last 1000yrs all tied up!

there's.

Actually, 'there are' would be more grammatically correct.
 
there's.

Actually, 'there are' would be more grammatically correct.

You are my hero, and I think that I love you, but purely as a grammar champion, so don't
expect me to be holding hands with you on a Pride march, under a multi coloured flag.
 
Back
Top Bottom