• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Hardware Unboxed Best Gaming CPUs

Associate
Joined
29 Jun 2016
Posts
825

Funny that he's had to comment under the video to justify his decisions after the AMD fanboys have been REEEEEEEEEEEEing at him and hurling abuse.
 
Steve is incredibly easily triggered, just one critical comment sends him over the edge. I looked at the comments, there aren't actually any negative comment in the first 20 at which point i stopped looking, and look at his like to dislike ratio, its 1.9K to 80, that's better than most who don't complain about being the victim of fanboys.

This isn't the first time he has been triggered by an imaginary mass of "AMD fanboys" that didn't exist and it wont be the last, Steve just like the attention he gets from claiming to be a victim.

Anyway, its a good video but i think his 8400 conclusion is debatable, the 2600 is a faster gaming CPU but his reasoning is because you have to overclock it to make it faster, so with the 8400 being faster out of the box makes it better, i disagree with that because its just as cheap to overclock the 2600 as it is to run the 8400 which cannot be overclocked.

ObsFl52.jpg
 
Last edited:
The last video which was about general use CPUs got a bucket of moaning because it was heavily in favour of AMD.

It was in fact talked about on this very forum in its own little thread just like this one.
 
The last video which was about general use CPUs got a bucket of moaning because it was heavily in favour of AMD.

It was in fact talked about on this very forum in its own little thread just like this one.

lol yeah it was and that triggered more people locally here than probably among his entire 2K and counting comments.
 
Last edited:
the problem with these vids IMO is they say gaming and general use, gaming means benching on a clean install with no extra processes which is unrealistic and general use means people who only run blender 24/7. its silly... surely people can run a benchmark in real world setting and I think we would find more along the lines of:

for normal people who play games:
8700k for the next 4 years of gaming and general use it will be awesome
2600/x because its good value and looking at 1-2 years will be great
then as per every vid

For 144hz:
Intel
Intel
why are you looking here get to 5ghz overclock or you will fall behind!

For people who don't game and are normal:
2600/x or 8400 will serve you for the next 5 years or get cheaper it really will be OK

For people using their CPUs professionaly (image editing or anything else):
You should care only SPECIFICALLY about your own programs please seek advice from the people who also use the same programs, it's likely your choice will be fine as general use because you'll spend enough as its a business decision.

obviously this is facetious but the point is use common sence because these videos use benchmarks as far from your desktop as linux is.
 
A comment on overclocking is reasonable but many people dont. Even if they buy a computer equipped with a K cpu or an unlocked AMD. It is still very much a minority diversion. Still some people do get excited about overclocking to the max, and I was one once, now I just overclock to run my software a litle bit quicker and smoother.

Most people use what they have bought and either do not have the knowledge, the right ancillaries or cannot be bothered. If they feel they need more frames they just buy a better card whereas the whole point of an overclock is to reduce the need to spend more money IMO
 
Back
Top Bottom