Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
To be fair you are BOTH RIGHT in your own way, it's really depending on how you look at it (as I mention depending on the games).nice one...pints on him then, thanks fellas
would a c2q 9550 @ 3.8 be a bottleneck for a 570?
I think the 3.8 is still fine but he says not...I'm almost 100% sure i'm right but I just need someone to confirm![]()
To be fair you are BOTH RIGHT in your own way, it's really depending on how you look at it (as I mention depending on the games).
For example if the question was "Would a Q9550 at 3.8GHz bottleneck the GTX570 in Arma II?", then the answer would be "yes".
I suppose a more valid question is, will I notice any bottleneck with a Q9550 and a 570?
Actually the answer is "no"...not without turning settings down, and the limitation will be more on CPU side than graphic card. And yes even if the Q9550 being overclocked to 4.2GHz, it will still struggle to deliver playable frame rate at max setting, considering frame rate wise it can't compete with overclocked i5/i7 etc, and the minimum frame rate will dip to below 20fps again and again, even when GTX570's GPU usage is not at 100%.Can a Q9550 @ 3.8 with a 570 handle Arma II at more than playable frame rates.... "Yes"
And no. Not noticing and having playable frame rate does not equal to not having bottleneck. You are like saying a "Athough the 5870 may be only delivering the same frame rate as a 5850 in this game, but since both are delivering same playable frame rate, therefore the 5870 is not being bottlenecked".I suppose a more valid question is, will I notice any bottleneck with a Q9550 and a 570?