• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Help needed, fanboy's please keep schtumm and move along

Permabanned
Joined
10 May 2004
Posts
988
Location
Preston,Lancs
Hi All,

I'm having an issue whether to keep my X2 4200+ currently at 2.9 or to move to a 2180 an run that at 3-3.2 ish apart from the slight bump in clock speed would there be any definate noticable benefit? I do the odd bit of encoding ( audio and video ) light gaming, office task's and that's about it.

The X2 does everything I need it to at the moment but like everyone here if I can get "more" I'd like "more" hence the 30% o/c on the X2

I'm using XP but can see me moving over to vista in the next 6 months so I can utilise more memory, my current setup (as per sig) limits me to 2gb max, I understand that vista would be a more comfortable experience with 4gb+. If this is true then whilst moving from a shuttle to a traditional ATX system would I be wise to move to C2D with the option of going Quad next year ?

As title I don't want this to become the same old amd/intel slagging match, I'm not tied to any company I merely want the best I get get for as little as possible.

Thanks
 
couldn't have asked for a better response than that, all your input is much appreciated fellas, cost wasn't an issue at all. I could replace my sn25p with mobo + psu + case at no loss, X2 would have fetched £45 ish as it's a damn good clocker, I'd have made a tad on Ram as my OCZ would go for around £85 at auction. I'd have retained hdd's dvd r/w gpu. as you pointed out there is little if any real world gain I'll stay nicely where I am.

Thanks again
 
Back
Top Bottom