Help to select a CPU/MB/Ram bundle for £200

Quite tempted by the G3258. I could get a decent MB with it so could add ram or a better cpu when I can afford it. To be honest, it may be fine for my needs looking at reviews.

Is it worth getting a z97 over one of the cheaper H boards that can over clock this?

The H97 should be able to overclock but for futureproofness/use of faster RAM and more features etc, I'd spend £4 and get the likes of what snips specced/a Z97P-D3 motherboard - if you go for a i5k or i7k used in the future, allows for decent overclocking
 
Quite tempted by the G3258. I could get a decent MB with it so could add ram or a better cpu when I can afford it. To be honest, it may be fine for my needs looking at reviews.

Is it worth getting a z97 over one of the cheaper H boards that can over clock this?

Don't bother getting the G3258 unless you plan on overclocking it..!

That's one of the annoying things about it, the CPU is really cheap but you have to spend £65+ on a Z97 motherboard for guaranteed compatibility / overclocking capability. If you're not overclocking, you're probably better off with an i3 in a £40 motherboard, cos those have hyperthreading and G3258 doesn't, for a similar price (for CPU + MB combined).
 
Don't bother getting the G3258 unless you plan on overclocking it..!

That's one of the annoying things about it, the CPU is really cheap but you have to spend £65+ on a Z97 motherboard for guaranteed compatibility / overclocking capability. If you're not overclocking, you're probably better off with an i3 in a £40 motherboard, cos those have hyperthreading and G3258 doesn't, for a similar price (for CPU + MB combined).

You can now overclock on H/B motherboards and a Z97 board allows for over clocking of K CPUs should the op decide to upgrade to an i5/i7 in the future
 
So am I right in thinking I could get an Hxx motherboard (starting from around £35), use it to overclock the G3258. Then if I wasn't happy with the performance I could stick an i5 or something in at a later date, but wouldn't be able to overclock that (even if it's a K version), unless I got a Zxx MB?

I'm tempted to get a cheaper MB (some have fan control too by the look of it), then either just save the extra £40 or so, or possibly get 2x8gb Ram instead
 
I don't think 16GB RAM will make all that much difference doing photo editing, some yes but not worthwhile in this budget - video editing then yes, you'll need it.

If you can find an extra ~£20, this is what I'd do.

YOUR BASKET
1 x Intel Core i3-4330 3.50GHz (Haswell) Socket LGA1150 Processor - Retail £91.99
1 x Gigabyte Z97P-D3 Intel Z97 (Socket 1150) DDR3 ATX Motherboard £65.99
1 x TeamGroup Elite Black 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 PC3-12800C11 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit (TED38GM1600HC11DC01) £61.99
Total : £229.57 (includes shipping : £8.00).



i3 and an overclockable motherboard with a decent set of RAM.

However, if you don't want to spend £30 over

YOUR BASKET
1 x TeamGroup Vulcan GOLD 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 PC3-17100C11 2133MHz Dual Channel Kit (TLYD38G2133HC11ADC01) £65.99
1 x Gigabyte Z97P-D3 Intel Z97 (Socket 1150) DDR3 ATX Motherboard £65.99
1 x Intel Pentium K Anniversary G3258 Socket LGA1150 Processor - Retail £52.99
Total : £194.57 (includes shipping : £8.00).

 
8320 isn't much good on photo editing :(
8GB RAM should be a minimum really

Lightroom 4 supports multicore rendering so I don't see what you're getting at? Also unless it is some seriously large images 8GB of RAM is fine. I edit high definition video on an i7 with only 8GB of RAM and never hit any issues.

Sure an i5/i7 may be more powerful but on a budget those AMD processors are more than adequate.
 
Lightroom 4 supports multicore rendering so I don't see what you're getting at? Also unless it is some seriously large images 8GB of RAM is fine. I edit high definition video on an i7 with only 8GB of RAM and never hit any issues.

Sure an i5/i7 may be more powerful but on a budget those AMD processors are more than adequate.

:o didn't know it supported multicore, but programs such as photoshop etc are single core only which the Pentium beats the AMD hands down. I do agree though the AMD processors are better generally, but for this I'd say Intel is favourable, simply adapting to what is needed
 
:o didn't know it supported multicore, but programs such as photoshop etc are single core only which the Pentium beats the AMD hands down. I do agree though the AMD processors are better generally, but for this I'd say Intel is favourable, simply adapting to what is needed

Photoshop has had multi-core since version 3! Almost every editing package out there now supports multi-core and a lot of the higher end packages even support GPU offload. GPU offload is great for video editing / photo editing.

Whilst I agree that for single core performance Intel is the way to go, I don't want the OP thinking they need Intel for photo editing.
 
Oh, I read on other threads with other people photo editing still only supports single core

Well I suppose it's the OPs choice, imo Intel is the way to go, you get great single core performance either way but you could upgrade to an i5k/i7k in the future, whereas with AM3+ (dead socket) you couldn't upgrade too far but could still upgrade
 
Thanks again guys.

I think I'm going to go with the G3258 for now. My last decision is whether to go with one of the ASRock/Asus H61 boards that support OC'ing the G3258, or go with the Z97 board which has been linked to (only around £30 more), which would have more features and a better upgrade path (even to Broadwell I understand). It pushes my budget a bit though especially as I've decided I need a new powersupply too...
 
Back
Top Bottom