Hosting in the US v UK

Associate
Joined
3 Aug 2004
Posts
1,614
Location
Bendigo, Australia.
I have been told a few times that hosting in the US while generally cheaper, is slower than it's UK counterpart. Also would it not be difficult and costly to get hold of support should a problem arise? What are the pros and cons between US and UK hosting?
 
Adz said:
Increased latency means that transaction based protocols (http, ftp, pop3, imap, smtp, etc) are noticeably slower on anything but a dialup connection.

Hosting a UK site in the US may also have an impact on your search engine placement - for instance, searching for a site with a 'UK site' in Google will yield no results if the site has a GTLD domain and is hosted in the US. Something to bear in mind.

Cost benefits are negligible - for the most part only evident due to massive overselling from the US providers just to be able to compete. It's a very crowded market. Unless you need 50GB of space and 5000GB data transfer for $10/year, I doubt you'll find the US providers any more attractive than their UK counterparts.

As for getting hold of support, if you choose a decent provider, that shouldn't be an issue.

Note that a lot of UK based hosts lease dedicated servers from US based providers for cost reasons.

Last but not least, check out www.ochostreview.co.uk for some reviews. I'll shortly be adding a small icon showing where the company's servers are located which should prove useful.
I have been having a good read already, thanks. Location details would be useful. Thanks.
 
Back
Top Bottom