• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

How bad is a CPU 'bottleneck'?

Associate
Joined
11 May 2009
Posts
148
Hey all, I got the XFX 4890 recently and before I bought it I was aware of bottlenecks but couldn't really tell by how much. Been playing COD4 and in some places... fairly often in fact, my FPS drops to like 20, I didn't expect the bottle neck to be quite this severe.

I am playing with everything on max and at 1680 x 1050 to try put more stress on the card instead. My specs are as follows:

DFI LANPARTY UT SLI-D
AMD 4200+ X2 overclocked at 2.75GHz (Stock is 2.2GHz)
2 gig of RAM
XP SP2 (Fresh install just today), I also have access to Vista and Win7
Catalyst 9.5

It's an old rig I know but I had the 4890 as a bit of 'later on in the year proof' as thats when I plan on updating the rest of my system.

So in conclusion, is the bottleneck really that bad? and is there anything I can perhaps do to improve on the FPS with the current setup?

Thank you in advance :)
 
Yet again thanks a lot for the very swift replies and advice. I'll just have to wait it out until I can afford the rest. The whole reason I started with the gfx is because I had a 6600GT so even though there is a bottleneck, the 4890 is still a huge improvement starting point nonetheless :)

it's ram more than cpu i would say. with a 4890 with 1gb of gfx ram and 2gb in your system already you will need to upgrade your OS to a 64bit version to use more ram

Going to try this today, got nothing to lose :)
 
Back
Top Bottom