• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

How badly will a Celeron D Bottlenek second rig?

Man of Honour
Joined
30 Oct 2003
Posts
14,111
Location
Essex
Hi All,

Just a quick question, I am throwing together a second gaming rig as am getting a bit fed up of mates coming over and playing CS on my work laptop while I play on my machine.

The rig spec is as follows...

Celeron D - 2.26ghz
2gb DDR2
Gainward 6800GTs Golden Sample (AGP)

So I am wondering... How bad are the Celeron D processors? The socket is a 478 so I could hunt down a P4 but is it worth it? Will the above rig play CS:S with medium quality on 1280x1024 and how much of a bottleneck will the above celly be?

Thanks in advance.

Edit: Please excuse spelling etc, it's still early.
 
I'd say it would be bottlenecked more by the celerons low 2.26ghz clockspeed. Shouldn't be too bad for CSS though TBH. If you can get hold of a faster P4 (2.4ghz+) you might find a little extra performance.

I'd say just throw it together and see how you get on. :)

gt
 
I'd say it would be bottlenecked more by the celerons low 2.26ghz clockspeed. Shouldn't be too bad for CSS though TBH. If you can get hold of a faster P4 (2.4ghz+) you might find a little extra performance.

I'd say just throw it together and see how you get on. :)

gt

Thats the plan... It didn't cost anything at all so I will just see how it performs and possibly swap the celeron out for a P4 I have here in an old un-used server.

The board is a ASROCK of some description and has very little capability. I picked the card up yesterday but before that tried clocking the celeron which caused the onboard graphics corruption. I am hoping that with the 6800 in there I will be able to clock the celeron up to around 2.8 on stock volts without causing any graphics corruption, who knows it might help a little.
 
Last edited:
I got this up and running last night and gave it a test...

All details high at 1280x1024, no AA, no AF, and am getting around 55fps dropping to 50 ish during smoke etc.

Overall I am impressed with the Celeron D for doing single tasks, when multitasking it is an absolute pile of junk, I tried installing SP3 as well as transfering some files across my home network while browsing the net. What can I say the system was pretty much on its knees.

Next I think I will drop a P4 3.2 that I have handy into it and see what improvements are made.
 
Cool, pretty decent results TBH.

I'd be very interested to see the performance increase with an extra 1ghz clockspeed and some more onboard cache. Is the 3.2 a hyperthreader? If so then it should be a real nice boost! :)

Lastly, that 6800GT is a sweet little card so i'd say it should benefit. I used to have a 6800ultra and loved it.

gt
 
I plan on putting the P4 in there tonight, it is an Northward - EE apparantly, Am going to run some benchmarks before and after so I will put the results in here any recomendations on benches?
 
I suppose and 3DMark from 01 to 06 would be good. Superpi for the CPU too.

I suppose any games with benchmark tests would be useful too. I'm sure half life 2 deathmatch had a run through which gave you frames per second results. Used that in the past and it succesfully identified performance improvements as i moved from a 9600le to a 9800pro and then to an x850xt.

gt
 
If you have 2Gb RAM and a 6800GT then thats a pretty good start for CS.

would have thought a top-end P4 would be a bit quicker gaming-wise than a Celeron due to higher CPU speeds & bigger cache.

Still running 4 year old AMD Athlon XP3000 with 7600GT AGP & 2GB RAM that runs TOCA 3, FS2004 and Autocad & Inventor pretty sweet for me.
 
Back
Top Bottom