How damaging is it to OC the Core i7 to 4GHz?

Associate
Joined
10 Sep 2009
Posts
299
Apparently it is safe to OC the core i7 to 4GHz, with the right cooling and a stable motherboard. But, I was wondering, how long would the CPU remain stable for, especially under the stress of gaming and being on for long periods of time.

And would overclocking it to 4GHz significantly reduce the lfie expectancy of this CPU?

Just how advisable is this.
 
When you say i7 - you mean an 860?

So you're looking at running roughly 1.35V and 21 x 190 so I'd say unless you're looking to keep the CPU longer than, say, 20 years, you should be OK.

And no, I'm not kidding.
 
But, I was wondering, how long would the CPU remain stable for, especially under the stress of gaming and being on for long periods of time.

If it's not stable at 4ghz then the OC should be lowered. With good cooling and an appropriate amount of vcore, it should be 100% stable.

As far as how long the cpu will last, yes, you are reducing it's lifespan but who is going to keep and i7 for 5+ years anyway?

Just how advisable is this.

If you're willing to make efforts to control the heat and happy to go from 40yrs life expectancy to maybe 20yrs then it's very advisable ;-)

Overclocking is not for the timid though. For those concerned about longevity and finding stable settings, then I'd advise them to stick to retail speeds.
 
As 'rjkoneill' has stated in previous a previous thread If you use speedstep to save power your PC won't be running at 4GHz all the time. It will only go to 4GHz when the processes you are running demands it! Saving on elecy and the life span of the chip.
I agree with the other comment who keeps the same PC for 20 years(more like 5) before you upgrade again?
 
Last edited:
no one knows what the lifespan of these chips will be, at stock or overclocked. All the above are guesses. What can be said for sure is that processors are run hard, and rarely die. There are 4ghz q6600s which were clocked years ago and haven't shown signs of dying yet.

However this might not extrapolate. Now we're on 45nm, looking towards 32nm. Speeds and power consumption are up significantly, so elctromigration is going to become more of a factor as time goes on. Eventually the '20 years down to 10' is going to be a fond memory. However I doubt we've reached this point yet. 45nm quads have been thrashed and kept running for several years.

So I join the above in saying, effectively, "who cares"? It'll be good for the usable lifespan of the computer anyway. If however you run at 100 degrees, 1.5V, it will die and it will be your fault for not researching it. Keep it cold and keep the voltage somewhere sensible (within the Intel vid range counts, if you're running at a lower voltage than intel ship processors at it can't be too dangerous), and you'll be fine.

Lifespan of a processor. So the hotter it is, the faster it will die, but equally the higher the current density, the faster it will die. So if you run hot with high current density, it's not going to do very well. Either one of the other tends to be fine, high voltage and cold or low voltage and hot.
 
I have to agree with what Jon said. Keep the processor cool and keep the volts down below what Intel recommend, and it should last fine. Really, how long are you going to keep the processor for anyway? It should last around 2-3 years fine even overclocked. Just look after it, and all will be fine =)
 
Back
Top Bottom