• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

How good is the ARC750 gpu with the latest drivers?

Soldato
Joined
21 Oct 2002
Posts
7,425
Location
Bexhill on sea
As title really, whats the general consensus of opinion on this card. I've been asked to put a budget gaming pc together and I'm looking the various options between Nvidia, AMD and now Intel.
The system will be i3 12100, 16 gb DDR4 3200mhz ram, suitable mobo? Now I've been skim reading some of the reviews about the Intel 750 and it appears to be real VFM, putting up a good showing against the 3060,6600 and 6600xt, so my question is, is this Intel offering worth getting or am I letting myself in for a world of problems (I also fancy playing around with summat different as well!)
Cheers
 
If you don't play lots of old games and don't leave your PC idle for long periods, then it is plenty good enough. At lower resolutions it competes with the 6600, but at higher resolutions it gains ground and is more like a 6600/6650 XT.
 
I'm assuming the "don't leave the pc idle too long" is due to all these message the intel control centre spews out? oh, and isn't the ray tracing performance pretty good also? (not that its important to me, but it might be to who gets the pc). The other thing is cost, its a fair bit cheaper than I would thought
 
I'm assuming the "don't leave the pc idle too long" is due to all these message the intel control centre spews out? oh, and isn't the ray tracing performance pretty good also? (not that its important to me, but it might be to who gets the pc). The other thing is cost, its a fair bit cheaper than I would thought
From what I've seen it doesn't seem to idle as low as nvidia/amd cards, although there's supposedly a fix for it too for the 750.

Intel focused on 'next gen' requirements at the expense of dx9 etc, arguably a sensible approach if you're aiming for a specific gaming market segment in the future but maybe not for the first release which has fallen in the more 'budget conscious' cost range where people will likely be playing older games....
 
I'm assuming the "don't leave the pc idle too long" is due to all these message the intel control centre spews out?

In this video, the idle of the A750 was 35 watt, the 6600 was 4 watt. I guess that could be a deal breaker for some. I don't know if the BIOS/setting changes Intel recommends were made though.

isn't the ray tracing performance pretty good also?

Yes, my understanding is that they're a bit behind NVIDIA and use dedicated hardware which AMD doesn't have (or not to the same degree). I don't think it matters much at this level of performance.
 
I'm assuming the "don't leave the pc idle too long" is due to all these message the intel control centre spews out? oh, and isn't the ray tracing performance pretty good also? (not that its important to me, but it might be to who gets the pc). The other thing is cost, its a fair bit cheaper than I would thought
Idle power consumption is the problem. It pulls 40W+ even on the desktop, which is absurd for a modern GPU. Intel have issued guidance for a means to lower it to something more reasonable, but it requires both Windows and BIOS settings changes, and the BIOS settings aren't available on all motherboards. For instance, it's certainly not available on MSI's AM4 boards, which is what I have, so there was nothing I could do about it (which is one of the reasons I sent my A750 back). From what I understand few, if any, AM4 boards do have said settings. I don't know about AM5 or which specific Intel platforms do. I've also read mixed results from people even after enabling the required settings, but some certainly have got it down closer to 10W.

As for general experience with the card, it really falls down in older titles. It was slower or no faster than the GTX 1070 it replaced in most of the DX9/10/11 games that I tried. However, you can use DXVK in many titles to boost performance. That's built into the driver to some degree now, but it operates on a whitelist system. Most games won't use it without manual intervention. In DX12/Vulkan it performs pretty well most of the time. I had no major issues and XeSS looked fine to me in the couple of games I tried it with, plus actually boosted performance to a good degree and more than FSR2 (which it doesn't on non-Intel cards). That said, whilst its ray tracing capabilities are impressive in relative terms, it's still way too slow for ray tracing in most games. In World of Warcraft it ran just fine with the ray traced shadows, but in Hogwarts Legacy turning on any of the ray tracing features (even on low) dipped it way below 60fps at 1440p/mixed settings, even with Quality XeSS enabled. I also tried it in Cyberpunk and that was also well below 60fps at 1440p with my optimised settings and any ray tracing on.

For what it's worth mine (the Intel 'Limited Edition' model) also had some rotten coil whine and the bright white logo on the side of it is super obnoxious. There's no way to turn it off that I could find. Apparently you can on the A770 LE though. Apart from that, I was actually super impressed with the cooler. It's extremely quiet, despite the small size. They've done a great job on it, bar the tacky glued-on backplate. It weighs much more than you'd think.
 
I reckon the obvious comparison is between the arc 750 and 6600 personally due to the cost being near identical, with the really just the differences between them in like R/T, 1440p performance, idle power, etc
 
I reckon the obvious comparison is between the arc 750 and 6600 personally due to the cost being near identical, with the really just the differences between them in like R/T, 1440p performance, idle power, etc

At 1080p, I agree, but I'd buy the Arc for 1440p (or lol, 4K), no question. RT is barely playable anyway and in a few years time it definitely won't be. I see the 6600 as an inferior card but a better all-rounder, because of the maturity & consistency the 750 doesn't have.
 
Last edited:
Thought about this one?

I'd love to use one of those (I had one a while back) but it stretches his budget a bit too far unfortunately. Thats the trouble with some people, they expect a cray spec computer for the price of casio wrist watch so I'm really trying to keep costs as low as possible
 
I'd love to use one of those (I had one a while back) but it stretches his budget a bit too far unfortunately. Thats the trouble with some people, they expect a cray spec computer for the price of casio wrist watch so I'm really trying to keep costs as low as possible
Ah I thought they were similar in price as was looking at this

but just noticed one for 250 quid
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom