16-35mm f/2.8. Unfortunately it's almost double the price.Phoenix_Cosmos said:There is a 17 - 35 aswel I think ? :S (please confirm)
Thats what you get when you combine L & f2.8glitch said:16-35mm f/2.8. Unfortunately it's almost double the price.
glitch said:16-35mm f/2.8. Unfortunately it's almost double the price.
No other lens available for around £500 or less offers what the 17-40L F4 does.mark35 said:how good a lens is this or are there any better ones out for round the same price
It's not worth double the price though, is it?Phoenix_Cosmos said:Thats what you get when you combine L & f2.8
Providing you have a filter on the front.SDK^ said:Weather sealed
I dont find I require that depth of field from that focal range.. Only on a macro & telephoto do I need that. I wouldnt say its not worth it.. Its just I doubt you'l find anyone tell you a bad thing regarding the 17-40. Its on my camera more than any other.glitch said:It's not worth double the price though, is it?