• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

How important are Cuda Cores for building a PC intended for media creation?

Boo_OS

Boo_OS

Boo_OS

Associate
Joined
26 Apr 2024
Posts
12
Location
The Mainframe
Hi there,

I'm looking to upgrade my GPU, my PC is a mid tier workstation intended for Adobe Suite and 3D modelling. I've always been an Nvidia user but due to multiple issues with two cards now due to faulty memory, lack of VRam, and buggy utilities, I've been considering taking the leap to team red and grabbing a

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT.​

Basically I want to know, how much am I going to miss the benefits Nvidia cards currently offer in media creation. I'm not particularly up to date with current cards as I took a long (7 year) hiatus from PC building, so if somebody could break that'd be great.
My current specs:
  • i7 12700

  • Corsair VENGEANCE LPX DDR4 RAM 32GB (2x16GB) 3200MHz​

  • RTX 3060Ti MSI Ventus 2x OC LHR >>> AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (???)​

  • 1x WD BLUE SN570 1TB M.2 2280 | 2x Crucial BX500 SATA SSD 2TB, 2.5 | 1x Seagate BarraCuda, 4TB

  • TUF GAMING B660-PLUS WIFI D4​

  • RM850X V2​

 
Last edited:
I think Adobe has features for Nvidia graphics cards. Well the gaming featured of Nvidia cards you don’t need ray tracing and super sampling (DLSS). However the cuda cores are important I’d say in premier elements
 
Last edited:
Afaik Nvidia GFX cards are used exporting say h264 etc in premiere via nvidia codec (my 3080 is at least as fast as the M1 studios at work quite probably faster) as well as when applying effects, there have been advances in recent builds to do with the general speed of the timeline but I don't know if they are nvidia specific
 
Last edited:
Boo_OS said:
Basically I want to know, how much am I going to miss the benefits Nvidia cards currently offer in media creation. I'm not particularly up to date with current cards as I took a long (7 year) hiatus from PC building, so if somebody could break that'd be great.
Click to expand...
You need to answer what gpuerrilla asked because it depends on which apps and exactly what you're doing. I've watched a fair few videos on this channel and his general advice is: 2D work you can use either, but for 3D nvidia is often much faster. From the benchmarks I've seen (which are subject to driver and app updates and this can change things A LOT), if you do a lot of 3D work, AMD is significantly slower (and by significantly I mean, not even in the same league, you just would not buy one for professional use).
 
Also what type of scenes are you building in 3D? How much VRAM are you going to need because once you run out you lose significant chunk of speed (assuming it doesn’t insta crash).
 
Tetras said:
You need to answer what gpuerrilla asked because it depends on which apps and exactly what you're doing. I've watched a fair few videos on this channel and his general advice is: 2D work you can use either, but for 3D nvidia is often much faster. From the benchmarks I've seen (which are subject to driver and app updates and this can change things A LOT), if you do a lot of 3D work, AMD is significantly slower (and by significantly I mean, not even in the same league, you just would not buy one for professional use).
Click to expand...
gpuerrilla said:
I would list the frequency and importance of the apps you use first.
Click to expand...
I mainly use Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator for rasterized and vector graphics, I would say I use 3D software the least to be honest. Maybe once every every few weeks when a clients commission requires it, it's definitely not all that important to me. Video editing (PR, AE) however is something that I'm interested in pursuing more often, the type of video editing that requires MULTIPLE files and plugins that would need to be compressed video Adobe Media Encoder.
 
Was going to reference this guy as he has done a lot of videos on the topic. Not to say he has his bias but bear that in mind. Now I do recall watching some other videos where AMD has done very well in some apps because they have started working with the vendors products.

However looking at what you have I would stick with the 3060Ti for a bit.
 
gpuerrilla said:
Was going to reference this guy as he has done a lot of videos on the topic. Not to say he has his bias but bear that in mind. Now I do recall watching some other videos where AMD has done very well in some apps because they have started working with the vendors products.

However looking at what you have I would stick with the 3060Ti for a bit.
Click to expand...
Yeah probably for the best, at least until FSR 3.1 comes out. I'm struggling to pull the trigger on an £600 on a card with only 12gb of Vram.
 
Last edited:
gpuerrilla said:
However looking at what you have I would stick with the 3060Ti for a bit.
Click to expand...
I never noticed the OP has a 3060 Ti, oops. I agree with you, I wouldn't get a 7800 XT unless there's clear benchmark data that it would offer a significant improvement.

AMD's workstation performance can be so hit and miss that in some cases the 7800 XT could even be slower than the 3060 Ti.
 
Tetras said:
I never noticed the OP has a 3060 Ti, oops. I agree with you, I wouldn't get a 7800 XT unless there's clear benchmark data that it would offer a significant improvement.

AMD's workstation performance can be so hit and miss that in some cases the 7800 XT could even be slower than the 3060 Ti.
Click to expand...
Do you think a 4070Ti super would be bottlenecked with my current system? It is obviously much more expensive than the 4070 / 7800XT, but it offers what I want out of both cards.
 
Honestly if its pure productivity then look at Apple, even davinchi resolve h.265 performance and quality is better then Nvidia and AMD.

My 4K renders on my M1 Macbook air yields like 70-80 FPS on the render speed.

My 7800XT for the same sorta setting is around 61 FPS.

when I had the 3070ti, it was around 40 FPS for similar setting, this was using h.265.
 

This Premiere Pro benchmark video should give you an idea of how AMD performs vs Nvidia. The 7800XT 16GB actually looks better than the 4070Ti 12GB. It has more VRAM and AMD has made good progress in the software recently. Also ZLUDA can run CUDA code on AMD cards without any performance penalty. The argument over which vendor does content creation better doesn't apply anymore.
 
Last edited:
There is another guy (wendell at L1 techs) who covers AMD a lot but he tends to use linux as an OS. It all depends on what productivity, conversions or bulk tasks your planning to do. Don't forget when your switching ecosystem like going mac there will be things to factor in like software/subscriptions that you didn't have/need beforehand. I can see though also its strengths which ultimately only the OP knows.
 
Boo_OS said:
Do you think a 4070Ti super would be bottlenecked with my current system? It is obviously much more expensive than the 4070 / 7800XT, but it offers what I want out of both cards.
Click to expand...
Bottleneck considerations for content creation are totally different to bottlenecks for gaming. If you're heavily using the 3060 Ti at the moment (you'd have to monitor your usage when you're getting slow downs or running long duration workloads) then the 4070 Ti Super might be worthwhile, but if you are finding that the CPU is being used a lot, then no.

I'd check the benchmarks on Puget too, as suggested above.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom