Hi guys,
Just had a quick thought after seeing something...
Say a school of around 1200 people total (including staff/pupils) had an IT system consisting of around 800 computers all on an AD domain and managed in the school. Everyone would have their own logons with password policies etc. There would need to be a way to manage all the computers/servers.
Say that a user was setup lets use the example of the username 'master', that had local admin rights to all the standalone computers, using a basic password so that any config/installs that need doing can be done on the clients easily. thats all fine.
But then say this same 'master' user account with its basic password, also had network admin rights/access to all servers/full access to all data onshared drives/all storage on the network, would this be bad?/a bad set up to have?
just wondering....
Just had a quick thought after seeing something...
Say a school of around 1200 people total (including staff/pupils) had an IT system consisting of around 800 computers all on an AD domain and managed in the school. Everyone would have their own logons with password policies etc. There would need to be a way to manage all the computers/servers.
Say that a user was setup lets use the example of the username 'master', that had local admin rights to all the standalone computers, using a basic password so that any config/installs that need doing can be done on the clients easily. thats all fine.
But then say this same 'master' user account with its basic password, also had network admin rights/access to all servers/full access to all data onshared drives/all storage on the network, would this be bad?/a bad set up to have?
just wondering....