Just looking at this thread and the table showing data written, power on cycles etc. They don't seem to correlate to the health percentage.
Thread 'Almost Nackered SATA SSD's' https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/threads/almost-nackered-sata-ssds.19004962/
For example 850evo drives have a lower endurance rating than an 850 pro but even though they have been powered on more times and had more data on them they have a higher health rating?
I don't understand how it's calculated, is it a worthwhile metric?
Thanks
Scott
Thread 'Almost Nackered SATA SSD's' https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/threads/almost-nackered-sata-ssds.19004962/
For example 850evo drives have a lower endurance rating than an 850 pro but even though they have been powered on more times and had more data on them they have a higher health rating?
I don't understand how it's calculated, is it a worthwhile metric?
Thanks
Scott
Last edited: