How much does cache and FSB make to performance?

[Topitoff]

Is there much of a real noticable performance difference between the E4400, E6400, E6420 and E6600 when all run at 3.0GHz?

Cheers

T

 

[easyrider]

Is there much of a real noticable performance difference between the E4400, E6400, E6420 and E6600 when all run at 3.0GHz?

Cheers

T

Nope

Depends what you do

but I doubt if you had 4 pc lined up and you used one after the other you could go...

"Yup that ones got the extra 2mb cache"

 

[Topitoff]

Nope

Depends what you do

but I doubt if you had 4 pc lined up and you used one after the other you could go...

"Yup that ones got the extra 2mb cache"

Thats what I'd hoped you would say

Thanks

 

[gurusan]

Nope

Depends what you do

but I doubt if you had 4 pc lined up and you used one after the other you could go...

"Yup that ones got the extra 2mb cache"

Yeah I would bet on it. assuming no synthetic benchmarks were run

 

[simonnance]

4400 might be a bit of a drop with 1/4 the cache of the 6420/6600. Shouldnt be that much though

 

[Jokester]

From the benchmarks I've seen the 2xxx are about 5-10% slower than the 4xxx which are 5-10% slower than the 6xxx.

Can't remember the link offhand but someone posted it in the 2xxx overclocking thread.

Jokester

 

[Big.Wayne]

Can't remember the link offhand but [G_Wizz] posted it in the 2xxx overclocking thread