how not to be a wedding photographer.

[GAC]

god knows if the tog was the cheapest but damn this is nasty stuff.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4895713/Couple-sue-snapper-for-big-day-woe.html

Louise, 20, said the location — a 14th-century manor house — was not “the best to shoot in”.

says it all to be honest.

 

[GAC]

Internet, go and find more details of this tog!

i had a quick google and could only find what i think is a american tog, with only a few pic's on it. i wouldnt be surprised if its a friend of the family or someones daughter.

 

[GAC]

yeah that first one is the only one i could find. could be the 2nd one though

 

[GAC]

And a 3rd with a tilt shift

and a 4th with the all important fisheye !

 

[GAC]

Apparently she was recommended to the bride and groom ( I presume B&G wanted to pay as little as possible), so B&G asked said photographer to shoot their wedding. Also apparently she was/is a photography student and stated she had never shot a wedding, but wanted to build a portfolio.

If the above is accurate, then the bride and groom are the ones to blame, and have learnt a hard lesson.

No way should the student be sued, I actually feel a little sorry for her.

if thats all true the bride and groom should be punched in the face for being tight fisted sods.

 

[GAC]

Apparently they only paid £100, yet expected pro results...

says it all then.

 

[GAC]

oh dear. and to think how many of us are paranoid about how poor we could be, after viewing some shocking wedding pics i may break out my 4 year old point and shoot

 

[GAC]

Is that your 4 year old P&S or your 4 year old WITH a P&S?? I'm sure either could do better

hahaha, dont think i have a 4 year old anywhere so would be me with a 4 year old point and shoot.