How not to park: £82,000 Range Rover

Soldato
Joined
17 Jan 2011
Posts
9,033
Location
the King's city
This supercharged Range Rover Sport found itself stuck between a brick and a hard place when it crashed into a basement flat in Fitzrovia, central London.

The driver, who was unhurt in this week's accident, unintentionally tested the Range Rover's off-road credentials in a freak incident, which left the 2.5-tonne SUV stuck between a house wall and some railings in the posh London street.

http://cars.uk.msn.com/news/range-rover-sport-ploughs-into-basement-flat?page=6#image=1 <<< more photos

wId0JpU.jpg
 
Looking at the other photos it's appears the driver was cornering too fast. Not really a 'freak', 'off-road testing' incident
 
Thats why it was weird the police dont care - Obvious speed was a factor :confused:

Does look like he went a bit too fast round the corner, i guess range rovers aren't really designed to corner. I'm surprised the police aren't getting involved, the driver was obviously hammering it.
 
Looking at the other photos it's appears the driver was cornering too fast. Not really a 'freak', 'off-road testing' incident

Why waste time investigating it when no person is harmed? Imagine investigating all non injury RTCs...you have to draw a line somewhere.
 
Why waste time investigating it when no person is harmed? Imagine investigating all non injury RTCs...you have to draw a line somewhere.

I see what your saying but anyone on the pavement would now be under the car. Maybe the owner shouldn't be driving... we still penalise drunk drivers even if they don't kill anyone.
 
I see what your saying but anyone on the pavement would now be under the car. Maybe the owner shouldn't be driving... we still penalise drunk drivers even if they don't kill anyone.

Fortunately we don't live in your police state. The guy has just had his very expensive car trashed, he doesn't need further punishment. Also, we only penalise drunk drivers if they are breathalised, plenty of drunk drivers on the road going unpunished still.

Police aren't interested because nobody was injured and it will be very hard to prove anything. Put simply the effort involved to prove he was speeding simply to issue him 3 points is not in the taxpayers interest.
 
Fortunately we don't live in your police state...

A bit much maybe?
I would agree with you if he was going through a hedge into a field but this was 'central' London into someone's house where the risk of injuring someone driving like that is much greater (a lot of assumption speed was the only factor here).
 
when I crashed my car, the police said we wont we be perusing it. if I had hit another car or person then they would, obviously.
 
I see what your saying but anyone on the pavement would now be under the car. Maybe the owner shouldn't be driving... we still penalise drunk drivers even if they don't kill anyone.

It does seem odd. When my sister crashed into a pedestrian crossing (don't ask), the police gave her a talking to because there might have been somebody standing there.
 
Back
Top Bottom