How o get 364 using only a few numbers

[MadMan-JaMeS]

How do you get 364 using the numbers

4, 12, 3, 2, and 6 but you can't add at all

I'm stoked !

 

[Bloomfield]

Get rid of the 12 and 2 then rearrange?

 

[Kosmiche]

2 in the bottom rachel

 

[Dis86]

Two add three is five.

Multiply by six is thirty.

Thirty multiplied by twelve is three hundred and sixty.

Add the four.

 

[Kreeeee]

Two add three

you can't add at all

 

[muon]

It's obviously using some indices combination.

I can't be bothered to work it out.

 

[paradigm]

(12 x 6) x (3+2) + 4 = 364

 

[Dis86]

Missed that add at all. Read at it all. Dyslexia for the win!

 

[arknor]

countdown numbers game solver solutions are not coming up with any way without using +
I tried about 15 different ones too
are you sure it's not meant to be a target of 360?

this one seemed to be the better out of them
http://kogecoo.sakura.ne.jp/scripts/ticket_arithmetic.html

Get rid of the 12 and 2 then rearrange?

most likely.... is it on in IQ test somewhere or an actual mathematical puzzle?

 

[Leprechaun312]

(12 x 6) x (3+2) + 4 = 364

you have added, you can't add full stop

 

[Roadkillv1]

Get rid of the 12 and 2 then rearrange?

 

[Soundood]

42

 

[muon]

Are we allowed factorial?

Need some way of creating the prime factor of 13.

 

[The Funktopus]

Write down the three, the six then the four. Tadaaaa! You have your 364!

Oh I'm a Genius!

 

[estebanrey]

6!/2 = 360
12 - 4 Squared = -4

360 minus -4 = 364

 

[muon]

6!/2 = 360
12 - 4 Squared = -4

360 minus -4 = 364

Haha. I think the OP meant to exclude subtraction as well as addition.

 

[MadMan-JaMeS]

it says make the sum of 364 using only the numbers 4,12,3,2 and 6. You are not allowed to plus .

 

[estebanrey]

it says make the sum of 364 using only the numbers 4,12,3,2 and 6. You are not allowed to plus .

6!/2 = 360
12 - 4 Squared = -4

360 minus -4 = 364

I didn't even need the 3

 

[muon]

I didn't even need the 3

Yeh but you could always have just done

360-(-(4)) to do the same job. I can't see how it could be allowed.

 

[estebanrey]

Yeh but you could always have just done

360-(-(4)) to do the same job. I can't see how it could be allowed.

You need to make minus 4 though and yours implies a zero being in use when that isn't in the set. Hence why I needed to make it by minusing 12 from 4 squared (16).