Man of Honour
- Joined
- 11 Apr 2003
- Posts
- 9,389
- Location
- London
A conversation with a friend of mine just came back to me, and with it a burning question: why the hell don't Microsoft make processors so that they can put Windows on them? We'd discussed how reliable the Acorn machines were, and it was because the OS was on the CPU...
If there's anybody for whom that doesn't make sense, the benefit of putting the OS on a chip is that the system files can't be tampered with by dodgy users, botched installations, cheeky software etc.
If there's anybody for whom that doesn't make sense, the benefit of putting the OS on a chip is that the system files can't be tampered with by dodgy users, botched installations, cheeky software etc.