8 May 2010 at 21:35 #1 craptakular craptakular Soldato Joined 7 Jan 2007 Posts 10,607 Location Sussex, UK as titled
8 May 2010 at 22:14 #3 craptakular craptakular Soldato OP Joined 7 Jan 2007 Posts 10,607 Location Sussex, UK TY, I think I fudged my debian server as one of my HDD was 100% full. Sabnzbd, mediatomb and samba all stopped working lol. Data was safe and it didn't matter as I needed to update the HW anyway. Now using arch in a non-gui server, is this wise?
TY, I think I fudged my debian server as one of my HDD was 100% full. Sabnzbd, mediatomb and samba all stopped working lol. Data was safe and it didn't matter as I needed to update the HW anyway. Now using arch in a non-gui server, is this wise?
8 May 2010 at 22:37 #6 craptakular craptakular Soldato OP Joined 7 Jan 2007 Posts 10,607 Location Sussex, UK My arch desktop hasn't fell over yet either lol. The server is only running sabnzbd, mediatomb, NFS, samba, transmission-cli. So not much to go wrong is there?
My arch desktop hasn't fell over yet either lol. The server is only running sabnzbd, mediatomb, NFS, samba, transmission-cli. So not much to go wrong is there?