I'll take 1440p RT over 4k non RT anyday.
Same here. Ray Tracing improvements and VR performance are the two things that I compare when choosing graphics cards.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I'll take 1440p RT over 4k non RT anyday.
Well i don't regret getting a 3090 as i've had none stop fun with it since obtaining one. I do wish there was more performance in it though for the price you pay though i totally understand its not a gaming card and more of a workstation card.
Seems fair enough to me, its basically an overclock, something the Nvidia cards cant do. But you forget the huge price difference Rroff. Same/similar performance at £400 cheaper, actually doubtful how many actually got a 3090 for rrp. Nice to see Amd back with cards that are competitive which means we should benefit if and its a big if, there is no price gouging. If there is gouging I'm out and going for an Xbox Series X, if I can find one!I'd wait for reviews/tests with Rage mode and SAM in effect it probably is fairly similar power/performance in actual use to Ampere.
Seems fair enough to me, its basically an overclock, something the Nvidia cards cant do. But you forget the huge price difference Rroff. Same/similar performance at £400 cheaper, actually doubtful how many actually got a 3090 for rrp. Nice to see Amd back with cards that are competitive which means we should benefit if and its a big if, there is no price gouging. If there is gouging I'm out and going for an Xbox Series X, if I can find one!
I'd wait for reviews/tests with Rage mode and SAM in effect it probably is fairly similar power/performance in actual use to Ampere.
Nope just more money than senseYou don't regret getting it, none stop fun
But then you do wish you you had more performance....
???????????????
Is your wallet getting a reality check over your brain?
and RAGE mode is turned on which is the OC mode, not SAM
Having the additional hardware utilisation for the IO with SAM is likely going to be increasing the power draw - though I'd wait for testing to be sure.
How do you think Nvidia will react to today's launch by AMD? It was an utter curb-stomp, wasn't it?
AMD had to use both Rage mode and SAM to match/beat the 3090 so I doubt nVidia will worry much there and the 3090 has more VRAM.
The 3080 with less VRAM and the 3070 which looks to get beat on both performance and VRAM and have no pricing advantage are going to be the tougher spots for nVidia.
Although I'm not sure about Infinity Cache depending on how much AMD is depending on it for performance as it is more a technology that belongs in console space and might not hold up in the longer term on desktop.
Apparently rage mode = slight power limit increase, so the 1-2% makes sense. I think it's very clear these cards will have a LOT of OC headroom. The AIB showdown is going to be so much fun!
I'd be cautious using the term launch. I mean they're not available until 18th of Nov and 8th Dec and we don't know to what degree that will be a paper launch or what availability will be like at launch and going into the Xmas period.
It wasn't really a curb stomp, they provided competition at all levels which is great and a solid choice for gamers. The only thing that really got stomped was the 3090 and that was on price. But honestly reviewers had all made this clear that this is not a gaming card, it's for prosumer work. I expect the 6900XT will be countered with a 3080Ti at the same kind of price point, which will have a GPU closer to a 3090 but with say 12Gb of vRAM on it.
I think Nvidia will probably push for greater RTX implementation in headline titles like CyberPunk 2077 and push for DLSS implementation so people can get the one-two punch of RT effects with high resolution. I see worryingly little in the way of ray tracing benchmarks from AMD and no equivelent to DLSS and my suspicion is that when we come to see games like the hotly anticipated CyberPunk 2077 come out, if Nvidia card owners can play that in 4k DLSS with Ray Tracing all cranked up with a good frame rate that'll be a good experience for them. And The question becomes can AMD match that ray tracing performance to enable those effects, and can they match DLSS to provide the upsampling to make it enjoyable at 1440p or 4k? That's what I'm holding my breath for because I don't want to upgrade my GPU so I can go from 90fps in games to 150fps in games, I upgrade my GPU so games look prettier and my experience is better and more immersive. And RT is a key component of next gen gaming.
But they might release a titan card also to cover that base.all the Titan functions so the card has access to its full prosumer performance which the 6900XT or any RDNA 2 card will not come near.
Me on the other hand find it insane to still game at 1440p, a resolution that even console gamers are now shunning. My 8 year old nephew will be gaming at more than than twice the resolution compared to you in his little consoleI'll take 1440p RT over 4k non RT anyday.
I'd be cautious using the term launch. I mean they're not available until 18th of Nov and 8th Dec and we don't know to what degree that will be a paper launch or what availability will be like at launch and going into the Xmas period.
It wasn't really a curb stomp, they provided competition at all levels which is great and a solid choice for gamers. The only thing that really got stomped was the 3090 and that was on price. But honestly reviewers had all made this clear that this is not a gaming card, it's for prosumer work. I expect the 6900XT will be countered with a 3080Ti at the same kind of price point, which will have a GPU closer to a 3090 but with say 12Gb of vRAM on it.
I think Nvidia will probably push for greater RTX implementation in headline titles like CyberPunk 2077 and push for DLSS implementation so people can get the one-two punch of RT effects with high resolution. I see worryingly little in the way of ray tracing benchmarks from AMD and no equivelent to DLSS and my suspicion is that when we come to see games like the hotly anticipated CyberPunk 2077 come out, if Nvidia card owners can play that in 4k DLSS with Ray Tracing all cranked up with a good frame rate that'll be a good experience for them. And The question becomes can AMD match that ray tracing performance to enable those effects, and can they match DLSS to provide the upsampling to make it enjoyable at 1440p or 4k? That's what I'm holding my breath for because I don't want to upgrade my GPU so I can go from 90fps in games to 150fps in games, I upgrade my GPU so games look prettier and my experience is better and more immersive. And RT is a key component of next gen gaming.
Me on the other hand find it insane to game at 1440p a resolution that even console gamers are now shunning. My 8 year old nephew will be gaming at more than than twice the resolution compared to you in his little console
Plus ray tracing will work just fine on RDNA 2.