Antx777 said:Your scores are higher than mine, I have an FX-55/X1900XT-X (512meg) (05.>10,780, 06>5,200![]()
Maybe it's the "X2" that makes the difference
Ant
nice edit

Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Antx777 said:Your scores are higher than mine, I have an FX-55/X1900XT-X (512meg) (05.>10,780, 06>5,200![]()
Maybe it's the "X2" that makes the difference
Ant
Antx777 said:Your scores are higher than mine, I have an FX-55/X1900XT-X (512meg) (05.>10,780, 06>5,200![]()
Maybe it's the "X2" that makes the difference
Ant
Tom|Nbk said:my x2 at 2.6 is faster than your fx-55 afaik, this thing really flies at 2.6. my score is better than yours in 06 because of the dual core usage but is also faster than yours in 05 because my chip is faster?
BoomAM said:Something that no-one appears to have picked up on is that a X2 3800 doesnt run at 2.6Ghz.
It runs at 2.0Ghz.
lay-z-boy said:That's most probably due to the fact we have all assumed its overclocked?
Maybe.lay-z-boy said:That's most probably due to the fact we have all assumed its overclocked?