How would my machine run the witcher 2 ?
- Thread starter Subzero85
- Start date
5750 or 5770?
Check in Device Manager.
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,609
- Location
- London
If you wanted a better experience, you might get away with a 5850 at minimum.
I'v got a 5870 and I am playing the game 1920x1200 at the default Ultra settings.
If you'v already got a 5770, trying getting another one for xfire.
I'v got a 5870 and I am playing the game 1920x1200 at the default Ultra settings.
If you'v already got a 5770, trying getting another one for xfire.
How about mine
gtx 260
4 gig ram
Q9330 core 2 quad @2.50ghz
I'll be playing at 1600x1080
About the same. I don't know how cpu intensive the game is, I assume not very, however, you would do well to overclock yours to around the 3ghz mark.
About the same. I don't know how cpu intensive the game is, I assume not very, however, you would do well to overclock yours to around the 3ghz mark.
thanks
Just make sure the cpu cooling is adequate first, something better than the standard, stock cooler it was originally fitted with at birth.
Last edited:
Just make sure the cpu cooling is adequate first, something better than the standard, stock cooler it was likely originally fitted with at birth.
ya stock cooler is what I have,I had to replace it in june actually with a new one.
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,609
- Location
- London
Not showing off, but as a benchmark for you guys.
My PC plays the game at default ultra settings at 1920x1200 using a 2Gb 5870, [email protected] and 4Gb ram.
Thats the ball park you need to play it at ultra settings.
When I was using the 11.7 ATI drivers, it wasnt as smooth, but the 11.8 drivers was a massive improvement and the game is smooth now.
Im hoping my PC holds together when BF3 launches.
I'd say at a base minimum you'd get away with a Core2Quad at around 3Ghz and a 5850 or GTX 460/560
My PC plays the game at default ultra settings at 1920x1200 using a 2Gb 5870, [email protected] and 4Gb ram.
Thats the ball park you need to play it at ultra settings.
When I was using the 11.7 ATI drivers, it wasnt as smooth, but the 11.8 drivers was a massive improvement and the game is smooth now.
Im hoping my PC holds together when BF3 launches.
I'd say at a base minimum you'd get away with a Core2Quad at around 3Ghz and a 5850 or GTX 460/560
Last edited:
you'd probably get away with less - my 3.8 phenom2 and 460 runs it at ultra (minus ubersampling)
really?
i used these settings on my
amd 1055t
4gb ram
GTX460
i think ubersampling is the only framrate killing setting , i turned all the depth of field/motion blur crap off because i would rather play games without them.
i was using that FXAA injector someone made to get AA
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,609
- Location
- London
Straight from the Web site:
Minimum requirements:
Processor: Core 2Duo 2.2 GHz or dual core AMD 2.5 GHz
RAM: 1 GB Windows XP, 2 GB Windows Vista/7
Graphics: GeForce 8800 512 MB or Radeon (HD3850 512 MB)
HDD Space: 16 GB
Recommended requirements:
Processor: Quad Core Intel or AMD
RAM: 3 GB Windows XP, 4 GB Windows Vista/7
Graphics: GeForce 260 1 GB or (HD4850 1 GB)
HDD Space: 16 GB
Minimum requirements:
Processor: Core 2Duo 2.2 GHz or dual core AMD 2.5 GHz
RAM: 1 GB Windows XP, 2 GB Windows Vista/7
Graphics: GeForce 8800 512 MB or Radeon (HD3850 512 MB)
HDD Space: 16 GB
Recommended requirements:
Processor: Quad Core Intel or AMD
RAM: 3 GB Windows XP, 4 GB Windows Vista/7
Graphics: GeForce 260 1 GB or (HD4850 1 GB)
HDD Space: 16 GB
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,609
- Location
- London
How about mine
gtx 260
4 gig ram
Q9330 core 2 quad @2.50ghz
I'll be playing at 1600x1080
So in other words this is fine.
Are you all being completely honest about how you can run it?
I'm currently running a Quad core Phenom x4 955 @ 3.2Ghz, 8GB of 1333mhz DDr3, and a 2GB 6950 @ 850/1300
And I can only get 45-60fps on high settings, on ultra I would be around 30 and below which to me is completely unplayable, are you just playing at sub 30 fps or do you know something I don't?
*edit* I'm only running at 1680x1050 too, other people with inferior rigs claim to be running at 1920x1080 at ultra, fps dips would be way into single figures, sure it will look nice but do people just put up with the terrible frame rate for looks?
I'm currently running a Quad core Phenom x4 955 @ 3.2Ghz, 8GB of 1333mhz DDr3, and a 2GB 6950 @ 850/1300
And I can only get 45-60fps on high settings, on ultra I would be around 30 and below which to me is completely unplayable, are you just playing at sub 30 fps or do you know something I don't?
*edit* I'm only running at 1680x1050 too, other people with inferior rigs claim to be running at 1920x1080 at ultra, fps dips would be way into single figures, sure it will look nice but do people just put up with the terrible frame rate for looks?
Last edited: