Associate
- Joined
- 21 Apr 2011
- Posts
- 143
Alright peeps?
Couldn’t find one of these so decided to make one... hope its useful to someone.
I have read that most games don't use more than 4 cores, and that you can overclock higher with HT turned off, so turning HT off night be an advantage to many, right?
Im going to run benchmarks with HT on, on the highest BCLK value I can with a set of BIOS settings, then turn HT off, up the BCLK until it becomes unstable (using the same test as before) knock it back one (where it was last stable) and then run the same set of benchmarks, hopefully giving me a rule as to which is better, ok?
The main memory will change frequency as well as the CPU but thats the deal, right!? memtest will be run before both benchmarks to ensure stability.
My stability test will be 40 iterations of IBT on standard stress and with the appropriate amount of threads, ideally this would be longer but I don’t want this to take forever.
The benchmarks I will run will be 3DMark 11 and Heaven.
My setup
i7 860 (21x multi 1.264v LLC)
GTX 460 870MHz (tested stable)
Maximus 3
4gb GSkill RipJaws X (2:12 9)
CM GX650 PSU
Corsair A50 cooler
Results:
HT enabled:
BCLK 180
Heaven: FPS 47.9
Score 1206
min FPS 10.7
max FPS 114.5
3DMark: 3908
HT disabled:
BCLK 184
Heaven: FPS 48
Score 1209
min FPS 26.1
max FPS 111.9
3DMark: 4095
while these results are relatively mundane, the temperature difference was significant: the test with HT disabled was 9 degrees cooler under IBT and prime than the one with HT enabled (at the same voltage).
hottest core temps in degrees Celsius
HT – 72
OC – 63
this, I believe gives OC the clear advantage as there is lots of headroom for it to be improved.
hope this is a little interesting!
Have fun
Couldn’t find one of these so decided to make one... hope its useful to someone.
I have read that most games don't use more than 4 cores, and that you can overclock higher with HT turned off, so turning HT off night be an advantage to many, right?
Im going to run benchmarks with HT on, on the highest BCLK value I can with a set of BIOS settings, then turn HT off, up the BCLK until it becomes unstable (using the same test as before) knock it back one (where it was last stable) and then run the same set of benchmarks, hopefully giving me a rule as to which is better, ok?
The main memory will change frequency as well as the CPU but thats the deal, right!? memtest will be run before both benchmarks to ensure stability.
My stability test will be 40 iterations of IBT on standard stress and with the appropriate amount of threads, ideally this would be longer but I don’t want this to take forever.
The benchmarks I will run will be 3DMark 11 and Heaven.
My setup
i7 860 (21x multi 1.264v LLC)
GTX 460 870MHz (tested stable)
Maximus 3
4gb GSkill RipJaws X (2:12 9)
CM GX650 PSU
Corsair A50 cooler
Results:
HT enabled:
BCLK 180
Heaven: FPS 47.9
Score 1206
min FPS 10.7
max FPS 114.5
3DMark: 3908
HT disabled:
BCLK 184
Heaven: FPS 48
Score 1209
min FPS 26.1
max FPS 111.9
3DMark: 4095
while these results are relatively mundane, the temperature difference was significant: the test with HT disabled was 9 degrees cooler under IBT and prime than the one with HT enabled (at the same voltage).
hottest core temps in degrees Celsius
HT – 72
OC – 63
this, I believe gives OC the clear advantage as there is lots of headroom for it to be improved.
hope this is a little interesting!
Have fun