Huge difference in coretemp v real temp??

rare · 23 Apr 2012 at 12:17

Been running my 2500k at 4.5Ghz for a while now, but today I thought I would just play with it a little bit. Just set the voltage to auto for now and the multiplyer to 48. I usually use coretemp to monitor my temps but thought I would load up real temp at the same time, but the difference in the reported temp is huge!

Any ideas? :eek:

jeff6475 · 23 Apr 2012 at 12:26

i find core temp to mess up when i run IBT so i use real temp or hwmonitor for that test,you will get high temps with that 4.8 and auto volts i bet you got very hight vcore run CPU-Z and check vcore out

rare · 23 Apr 2012 at 12:32

Thanks, I think your right. The VCore was mental. No wonder temps were so high.

Wazz-1 · 23 Apr 2012 at 20:40

?? But why the massive difference between Real temp & Core temp,regardless of the vcore? If i run both temps are just about identical

jeff6475 · 23 Apr 2012 at 20:41

cos on mine core temp locks in so he may have same problem which is why the big difference

Wazz-1 · 23 Apr 2012 at 20:48

jeff6475 said:
cos on mine core temp locks in so he may have same problem which is why the big difference

Ok cool just thought it was strange or somthing i didnt know about between the two, no worries

nickeverett · 23 Apr 2012 at 21:12

Core Temp 7 HWmonitor freeze on my 2500k when running IBT. RealTemp is more accurate