What I'm asking is for actual evidence of this test being passed. As in a transcript of these "300 conversations" would be very useful, and extremely interesting, if you can please link. Some head of an "AI society" saying something is passing a test is not evidence of a test being passed at all! I'm sure this guy spouts a lot of BS to get funding for his little society. This is the difference between believing and knowing. I want to know if the test has been passed, not merely believe it was passed.
Also there's a blooming error in the first 2 words of that article lmao. I have no reason to take anything on that website about "language" seriously! "An historic"? Seriously? Who writes like that? Maybe if you pronounce "history" as "istory" you can get away with speaking "an istoric", but you cant do that in writing lmao