Hypothetical spec question

[ajf]

I keep looking at the newer high pixel full frame bodies from Canon and Nikon.
Whilst hypothetical at the moment, if you were buying from scratch, what body and 2 or 3 lenses would be the best combination?

I photograph mainly static subjects of flowers and vehicles, so typically 24-70mm (with close focus) range plus macro sometimes.
Occasionally do motorsport so range up to 300mm/400mm?

I went from Canon APS-C to Micro 4/3 and love the system and actually think it is better quality but still feel a lack of overall sharpness and clarity compared to photos posted here with full frame cameras, from the likes of mrk and raymond.

 

[ajf]

Thanks for the comments. Pretty much the same as my initial thoughts.
Whilst the high resolution of the 5D S is tempting from reading reviews of it, I am also aware of the superior dynamic range of Nikon sensors.
This was the biggest benefit I found with my 4/3 system. It seems to have much more leeway when editing bright or shadow areas.

I am not printing bigger than A3, so I guess it depends who noticeable the extra resolution detail would really show. Certainly with close ups of flowers some of the finer detail gets lost in my current set up.

 

[ajf]

Thanks again for thr comments.
Nice to hear another FX user also has an M43 system
I was intending to keep this anyway, as said above, the weight advantage out and about is great, and one of the main reasons I moved away from my APS-C.
However I have started doing more 'studio' shots (actually a coffee table and white paper roll in the spare room. Lol) and it is here where I really want to take the move up as weight and size are less of an issue. I already have a tripod so easy to manage.

Just looking on MPB at giude used pricing and interesting that the D750s they have are more than a D800E. I believe the 'E' version has the anti aliasing filter removed? is the same as the difference between the new Canon 5 DS and DS R?