• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

I don't think the question is should I upgrade, rather what should I upgrade to?

Associate
Joined
26 Sep 2022
Posts
87
Location
Usa
My current system:

MB: ASRock Z590 Extreme motherboard
CPU: i7 11700kf (liquid cooled 360mm)
RAM: 64GB memory
GPU: 6700 XT 12GB
HD: 1TB 7000mb/s m.2 (I have a second 1TB m.2 5300mb/s just for use as a scratch disk)
Monitors: Dual 32" IPS 1440p 165hz

I only bought the video card because it's what the best thing a physical store had in stock that I could afford. I always intended to sell it to someone for a decent price and upgrade. I am not looking to go Nvidia, as I still want to save money and those 40xx cards seem ridiculously huge. Plus I don't like those crazy power connectors.

My motherboard is only PCIe 4.0. But I don't think cards use or take advantage of PCIe 5.0 yet, right? Will my CPU be a bottleneck?

6900 XT 16GB is $719 and is like 63% faster effective speed than my current card
6950 XT 16GB is $789 but only adds minimal increase in speed than the 6900.. not worth the extra price unless I found a good deal.. so I think I can cross this one the list.
7900 XT 20GB is $899
7950 XTX 24GB is $999 (sold out though)

I do editing on Adobe Premiere, Photoshop, and Illustrator. I kind of want that new PC game coming out Returnal.. it requires 32GB memory, but I don't like space themed stuff, but I'm sure I'll find something else with good specs to play).

Should I go with the 6900 or 7900 series?

Anyone buying into some people saying AMD released RDNA 3 too early and that the bugs can't be software fixed?

GPU size is not an issue as I have the thing mounted horizontally on a riser.
 
Puget's content creation benchmarks with the new cards was super mixed, on a good day it is actually competitive with the 4080, or beats it, but it can also often be slower than even a 3080 and when NVIDIA has full software/API support it gets destroyed by the 4080/4090. You might want to have a good look at their article (and other content creation reviews/benchmarks) and think about what these results will mean to you(r usage). You might be lucky and benefit from the few things it excels at, or not be bothered by being a little slower than a 4080. Hopefully, driver updates will improve their consistency.

AMD have said RDNA 3 isn't broken and that it was misinterpreted, but one thing that is broken, is their multi-monitor and video power consumption (like: 100 watts of brokenness :eek: ).

In gaming, I wouldn't upgrade from a 6700 XT to a 6900 XT/6950 XT, just because I really think it is best to jump onto a newer architecture, bump up your VRAM and get a generational improvement in performance. The custom AIB cards are coming and I'd be looking at one of those. They're not great value, but that's just how it is and I doubt you'll be wanting to wait until the unicorn midrange value upgrade appears.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom