Associate
- Joined
- 4 Nov 2004
- Posts
- 391
I have a 1920x1200 but even with 2x BFG 7800GTs in SLI it's slow
Just a little background before I ask my q's:
Asus A8N sli premium
AMD X2 4400+
2 x BFG 7800GT
2Gig mem
Apple 1920x1200 monitor
So, I can play Half-Life 2 just about at native res, but things like F.E.A.R and Black & White 2 drop down to sub-10 fps sometimes.
I've got a few options, which would you recommend:
1) Sell the Apple monitor and get a 1600x1200 or 1280x1024 monitor
2) Keep the Apple monitor and get another monitor in parallel.
3) Get a better graphics set up.
Some basic calculations I did:
1280 x 1024 = 1.31 million pixels
1600 x 1200 = 1.92 million pixels (47% more than 1280x1024)
1920 x 1200 = 2.30 million pixels (20% more than 1600x1200, 176% more than 1280x1024)
So if I drop to 1920 to 1600 horizontal, we're talking about a fitfh difference. Will that equate to roughly a 20% FPS? Is it that simple?
Just a little background before I ask my q's:
Asus A8N sli premium
AMD X2 4400+
2 x BFG 7800GT
2Gig mem
Apple 1920x1200 monitor
So, I can play Half-Life 2 just about at native res, but things like F.E.A.R and Black & White 2 drop down to sub-10 fps sometimes.
I've got a few options, which would you recommend:
1) Sell the Apple monitor and get a 1600x1200 or 1280x1024 monitor
2) Keep the Apple monitor and get another monitor in parallel.
3) Get a better graphics set up.
Some basic calculations I did:
1280 x 1024 = 1.31 million pixels
1600 x 1200 = 1.92 million pixels (47% more than 1280x1024)
1920 x 1200 = 2.30 million pixels (20% more than 1600x1200, 176% more than 1280x1024)
So if I drop to 1920 to 1600 horizontal, we're talking about a fitfh difference. Will that equate to roughly a 20% FPS? Is it that simple?
Last edited: