I think what's odd about not being able to write a title or use ellipsis

Status
Not open for further replies.
Capodecina
Soldato
Joined
30 Jul 2006
Posts
12,130
Moderator #1 said:
I think what's odd about stockhausen isn't him as a member. It's his constant posting like an RSS feed and making a somewhat constructive opening post but then vanishes and doesn't post again in the thread. Possibly due to the abuse from other members which is getting a little tiresome too.
Moderator #2 said:
I quoted another member. Chill out a little.
What I find damned odd is that 'Moderators' arbitrarily close threads where their views differ from that of the OP and then keep posting to them.

They still do Sweet FA about the incessant pointless, irrelevant and abusive posts by the usual suspects.
 
The other side of the arguement is that you post news articles ...
That's true and I make no apologies for posting items of topical interest.

If they don't interest you, why not focus on the endless 'Spec me ...' or 'Things I bought last week ...' threads? There are more than enough to keep you fascinated from now until doomsday - I certainly wont know or even care.

... [you] make comments which are controversial/twisting the truth/factually incorrect/heavily biased/aim to provoke ...
Sorry about that, see above.

If you fear controversy stay away; if you feel that I have twisted the truth or posted something factually incorrect (according to you, a news article), feel free to correct it; if you feel I am biased, have a look around at most of my critics who are typically biased, inarticulate and remarkably stupid; if you don't want to be provoked into trying to defend the indefensible, read some other thread - e.g about why someone is awake at 4AM.

I don't deny that I think that the foreign tax-dodging Murdoch is a crook and shouldn't be in any way involved in the media or opinion forming in Great Britain; I think that Tories by and large are selfish, greedy oxygen thieves; I think that Bankers have destroyed this country's economy and are being rewarded handsomely for doing so; I think that Dr. Fox ought to be in jail; I think that Cameron is incompetent, has God-awful judgement and like Osborne is completely out of touch with how most people live.

I also think taht the NHS is one of the greatest creations in this country, it has many faults but these will not be fixed by allowing speculators to create wealth from ill-health - just have a look at the state of Dentistry in this country to see what the Tories have in mind for you.

Those are some of my strongly held beliefs, based on my observation of the behaviour of the people involved - your opinions may differ - feel free to try and convince me I am wrong - but without resorting to unrelated childish insults:)

... [you] then disappear from the thread without engaging with the posters who actually want a serious discussion. ...
Perhaps I read the posts made by others, desperately hoping for something worth responding to :confused:

Do you have any suggestions as to a polite way of responding to the playground comments made by the likes of PetInDaHood, Moron, Maggot, Vibratorman, TeaTray, SpareRibCage or whoever else :confused: :p


However, none of this has a whole lot to do with this particular thread, does it? ;)
 
I think mod #1 makes sense.

Even if you don't approve of some comments, just get on and ignore them and focus on the proper debate. It would result in the 'trolls' not seeing a point in trolling... ok the 'Lolhausen' trolls. ...
I can't comment on this since I wouldn't want to appear openly to be questioning moderators' actions.
 
To those who have invited me - and you know who you are - thanks, I am truly grateful but I really can't handle any more friendships - not even virtual ones ;)
 
Stockhausen threads make the members too excitable and we need to balance them carefully with x-factor and 'spec me a toaster' threads to keep control of the masses.

;)

Have you considered the very real possibility that were it not for my tireless efforts to keep the masses rooted to their seats, frothing at the mouth and abusing their keyboards they would probably be off rioting and looting DSG, Carpetright and sportswear stores :eek:
 
[FnG]magnolia;20300942 said:
I've read the title several times and I still don't know what it's supposed to mean. ...
Dons are moderators and control individual forums. They have the power to edit, delete, or move any posts in their forums.
Probably wisest not to pursue this particular line of thought too far.
 
Actually I would like to see the NHS to be in the same state as my Dentist.

Appointments at my convenience, treatment immediately, no waiting times, clean comfy surroundings, rather good looking assistants and emergency treatment within an hour.
In Britain today, you can stuff yourself on deep-fried Mars Bars, drink 20 pints a night, inject yourself with heroin, smoke 60 cigarettes a day or decide to change your sex - and the NHS has an obligation to treat you. You might go on a waiting list, but it will do its best to cure your lung cancer, patch up your nose after a drunken brawl or give you a hip replacement. It doesn't charge for operations or beds; it may even throw in some half-edible food.

But if you have bad teeth, forget it. You may be rolling on the bathroom floor in agony with an abscess, your gums may be riddled with disease, or people may recoil at the sight of your fangs as you walk down the street, but the NHS doesn't have to help you.

It is now virtually impossible for many people to find an NHS dentist, and if they do manage to squeeze on to a list, they could still be charged 80 per cent of the cost of treatment - unless they are a child, pregnant or on benefits.

The health service under both the Tories and Labour has victimised the dentally challenged - that is, anyone who hasn't inherited strong teeth and a perfect picket fence smile. Few can easily afford to go to any dentist now. My husband went to a private dentist after a 15-year gap, and was left reeling after they extracted £2,000 for 12 fillings. My three-year-old son received a bill for £90 after I stupidly asked my private dentist whether she could have a quick look at his teeth. (The Torygraph)
But yes, based on most of your posts, I can quite see why you, and Dolph come to that, would see Dentistry as the perfect model for the NHS to follow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom