Intel has always had a problem getting anywhere near AMD's iGPU performance, while AMD can get <60 FPS on low settings at 720P or 1080P with less demanding games, even on their mobile chips, Intel would struggle to get 30 FPS at 720P with any game other than CS:GO.
Recently Intel made some bold claims, that their Ice Lake Mobile chips would have iGPU's faster than those found in AMD current Ryzen 3000 series APU's.
That would require a MASSIVE hike in performance over their previous generation, because Intel are now developing their brand new GPU architecture many people thought; well maybe, AMD's iGPU's are actually quite old now, 3'rd time re-branded Vega, not Navi.
So Intel put out slides like this and no one questioned it.
Notice Fortnight on the left side?
What a load of old Ryan Shrout marketing that is, its complete and utter barefaced BS.
Reality. AMD's old Vega iGPU is still twice as fast.
Recently Intel made some bold claims, that their Ice Lake Mobile chips would have iGPU's faster than those found in AMD current Ryzen 3000 series APU's.
That would require a MASSIVE hike in performance over their previous generation, because Intel are now developing their brand new GPU architecture many people thought; well maybe, AMD's iGPU's are actually quite old now, 3'rd time re-branded Vega, not Navi.
So Intel put out slides like this and no one questioned it.
Notice Fortnight on the left side?
What a load of old Ryan Shrout marketing that is, its complete and utter barefaced BS.
Reality. AMD's old Vega iGPU is still twice as fast.