Iceland trip camera

FNG

FNG

Associate
Joined
28 Dec 2002
Posts
817
I am off to Iceland at the end of the year. I have been looking to get a camera for a while and was wondering on people's thoughts as to what direction to head in. I like the idea of something like the Olympus om1 mkii but am a bit worried that a 43rd sensor will be too limited on light? Other than that thinking of a aspc (Sony 6700?) or possibly full frame (weight and cost of required lenses and issue?). Have around 3k in total to spend, happy to spend less. Really struggling with what to get!!
 
In Iceland I am thinking mainly landscapes. Back home probably more wildlife. Not really much in the way of portraits. I am thinking at least a couple of decent lenses to cover wide and reach. Probably more zooms than primes just for space issues, but happy to consider primes. I think 43rd would suit this well. A tripod might be a push, it is not a photography holiday per se. I wonder if the ibis on the Olympus would help compensate against the light issue?
 
Locked in indecision at the moment. I don't think I want to lug full frame gear around which is why I had ruled that out in the past. The camera bodies are a decent size but if I want to do wildlife after thr trip the larger zooms are just too big. So I am focusing on Apsc or m43. Of the Apsc the sonys look well supported, as do the Fuji. I don't think canon has enough support with third party lenses. M43 seems to have some lovely glass and great body stabilisation, but is even more cropped and so less light. It is all very annoying :D
 
So I have had a look at them and like the look of the Sony 6700 and A7C2. There are advantages to both so I am really no further on :D Need to decide soon to get to play with it before we go.
 
I went to wex and had a play with them all. That moved me away from the Olympus towards to the Sony's. The full frame will undoubtedly be better for my Iceland trip, but after that the extra reach of the 6700 would be better for wildlife.
 
Back
Top Bottom