Idea on mavity

[Radiation]

I just had this thought the other day, it could also help explain dark matter and the webs they've simulated in space.

You know how when sound is put into a metal plate and its resonance makes any sand move to certain regions? Perhaps a similar thing is happening in space, matter may be the areas where the vacuums resonance meets/enters, so wherever matter is it attracts other matter around it and on a large scale forms web like structures in space which we call dark matter, its also the reason no one has found dark matter, i think particles are nothing more than boundary areas of tiny dimensional loops which could actually contain a huge area inside so the force travels in and out.

 

[CrowK]

I just emailed Stephen Hawking. He says you just blew his freaking mind.


Careful he doesn't steal your ideas though

 

[Marf]

"I call it a Hawking Hole"

 

[Radiation]

I just emailed Stephen Hawking. He says you just blew his freaking mind.


Careful he doesn't steal your ideas though

Nooo, he already stole the Doughnut shaped universe idea from homer!

 

[daz]

So did you pluck this idea from thin air or did you derive it using some clever maths and a few assumptions?

 

[Banzai_Joe]

Bored.......are we?

 

[Radiation]

So did you pluck this idea from thin air or did you derive it using some clever maths and a few assumptions?

Perhaps my mind does the maths and simulations, i just think based on the stuff i know and come up with ideas, like i thought most did, the start of a good theory doesn't need to come from maths, ill leave the calculations for the experts.

 

[Ice Tea]

The Big Bang Theory - mavity (thou art a heartless bitch)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgXOVGjIeyI

 

[Grrrrr]

I'm not entirely sure i get what you're saying but would your theory work on quantum scales? Hows does it explain time dilation and other effects?

 

[CrowK]

So did you pluck this idea from thin air or did you derive it using some clever maths and a few assumptions?

or from the Aether you might say

 

[daz]

We gave up on the Aether theory in the 19th century

 

[Stretch]

Bored.......are we?

If it wasn't for "free time" nothing would ever get done.

 

[Pulsar_GTI]

I just emailed Stephen Hawking. He says you just blew his freaking mind.


Careful he doesn't steal your ideas though

^^^ that answer made me laugh !!!

 

[Radiation]

or from the Aether you might say

Well the vacuum as they now call it does contain a lot of activity, strange things like particles popping in and out of existence, electromagnetism, stuff like that. It seems to me they're coming back around to some of the ideas on the aether.

 

[daz]

Well the vacuum as they now call it does contain a lot of activity, strange things like particles popping in and out of existence, electromagnetism, stuff like that. It seems to me they're coming back around to some of the ideas on the aether.

All of those effects are explained by Quantum Mechanics and the Standard Model...

Also, see the Michelson Morley Experiment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson–Morley_experiment

 

[Radiation]

All of those effects are explained by Quantum Mechanics and the Standard Model...

Also, see the Michelson Morley Experiment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson–Morley_experiment

They still can't seem to make up their mind whether mavity is space bending or gravitons, i think theres plenty of room for alternate theories about the true state of the universe, no doubt the theories we have give an idea and allow calculations to work, it doesn't mean you are getting a true picture of what the universe is really like though.

 

[daz]

They still can't seem to make up their mind whether mavity is space bending or gravitons, i think theres plenty of room for alternate theories about the true state of the universe

Of course there's plenty of room.

General relativity works very accurately on the big scale, involving planets and stars... but it doesn't deal quite so well with singularities and events on the quantum scale. We'll either refine general relativity further, or find a better model for it at some point.

 

[Tefal]

these theories, need at elast some maths and the ability to predict results acuratly to be recognised though.

Can your theory predict anything?

If not it's pretty much worthless.

 

[Shoseki]

My theory is that this is a universe existing in an infinite number of dimensions, where the number of dimensions of our universe then exist within another set, where each set could either be natural or artificially created by a creator, which itself could have either been created or appearing naturally.

So in fact I am neither a theist nor an atheist. I just know that we can't know either way, and that it probably doesn't matter.

 

[Radiation]

these theories, need at elast some maths and the ability to predict results acuratly to be recognised though.

Can your theory predict anything?

If not it's pretty much worthless.

What do you mean by predict and why would it be worthless? They can already predict how things act and react under mavity, however i want to get a true picture of the way the universe is and could be, theres nothing worthless about that.