If Fury X turns out to faster than 980 ti...will you switch?

[easyrider]

Again a genuine question in the top tier gfx card phenomena

@ 1440p and 4k....

 

[easyrider]

Nope, cause lets be honest. Going by past cards, there's so little between them when it comes to games. A few fps at best. Buy whichever card has the features you require.

What if the gap is bigger ?

 

[easyrider]

I doubt it will be tbh. From my past experience owning gtx 670 and gtx 780. The equivalent AMD cards at each time were very similar performance wise. Heck, at present I haven't even got my 980ti yet let alone think of changing. Intel igpu on the 4790k ftw. Funnily enough I've been pretty vocal about how much I wish Intel didn't include an igpu on theese chips as they're hot enough. Now look at me.

That's on the old DDR5 structure though...this is a total new tech...

 

[easyrider]

True, but I cant see hbm being that much difference in my case and res. Still on 1920x1200 here. Most likely moving to 2560x1440, which 6gb of gddr5 should cope with ok. As for 4k I think its way too early to adopt this res. You need multi gpu straight off the bat to deal with it. And with current cards such as the TX, that's the best part of two grand. Fury x may/may not change this. But for me personally, 4k is a long long way of.

I guess you're in a sweet place...you can wait for reviews and see how the fury x performs....

But that only if your head is not in the green camp and open a free to change

 

[easyrider]

Not enough memory... 4GB isn't enough for newer games in 1440p, let alone 4k!

If it shocked everyone and came out as 150% the speed of Titan X in most things, then I'd be tempted... but not otherwise.

- ATi (AMD) Crossfire support is terrible and slow
- no GSync

Freesync ....

 

[easyrider]

Freesync

 

[easyrider]

poostink

Nsync