Permabanned
- Joined
- 7 Oct 2006
- Posts
- 132
I agree that it is good practice to move your pagefile to a seperate drive (if you have one) and (even better) a seperate controller. I have been doing this for a long time. However I discovered that if I move my pagefile to a different drive and fail to leave a small amount behind on C: then Windows tends to ignore the settings and either use no pagefile at all or create a very large one on C:
Since my discovery I have created a small pagefile on C:, 2Mb minimum and 50Mb maximum. I have moved my pagefile over to my D: drive (seperate drive, controller). Rather than fix the pagefile I have left it dynamic - its on its own 5gb partition at the start of the drive.
I was suprised that windows was doing this. Since leaving small amount on C: my machine is running a lot smoother. Im not saying its going to be the same for you guys. Its worth looking into if you have moved your swap file to a different drive and found no improvement or even that your machine seems slower.
Some useful utilities to check your pagefile, so you can check what works for you.
http://billsway.com/notes_public/WinXP_Tweaks/
VB scripts that show your pagefile usage.
Let me know how it goes.
Since my discovery I have created a small pagefile on C:, 2Mb minimum and 50Mb maximum. I have moved my pagefile over to my D: drive (seperate drive, controller). Rather than fix the pagefile I have left it dynamic - its on its own 5gb partition at the start of the drive.
I was suprised that windows was doing this. Since leaving small amount on C: my machine is running a lot smoother. Im not saying its going to be the same for you guys. Its worth looking into if you have moved your swap file to a different drive and found no improvement or even that your machine seems slower.
Some useful utilities to check your pagefile, so you can check what works for you.
http://billsway.com/notes_public/WinXP_Tweaks/
VB scripts that show your pagefile usage.
Let me know how it goes.